From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7AEC43334 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232574AbiGLKUh (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:20:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44138 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232428AbiGLKU1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:20:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C531FACF7E for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id l42so4378625wms.5 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:20:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=04V4RQgBX7AsYN808fX5ZMZvvU/6A68Rai6mXeiPU1g=; b=LwceR9vem7LcRg0Hyt/kzuJes/XEsor4/Brw7bgsaxReUbQEJqa44JSxlOIkCRdVli RVgZqUrKK5cyjiJvbdqe/nUo/gtD6t7SnVBBe6ogZv6A/moJS6/vWcd88jCLoXCJKulb 72QjG2qObWvnpRV4LFzBl3lGkD7w9Z46ZPDhLSAjCLxI+kJZDuMlFltdMl0qdkThvyQH B56gFURabUsKijiMWjhfRYyvcfPcQ3ludLWmBV/XAoAAnhpdseOXdOr+6lFZfbOyC/He 69rO2givfRparQjSE7GKjbNWN2WjzjQqnIQuESVk6+swPhwuUE8NTdNlDTJ0FGYANEnK g8RA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=04V4RQgBX7AsYN808fX5ZMZvvU/6A68Rai6mXeiPU1g=; b=da4FqILELjEhHv/u3otQPbHL17yRKv5wQ1p/cD34/aZIrxw3ok7xZh/oVqBxA8Ykuk 9kpl4qlqmLpQzrpC7q7/leiq2mm3BjJrBCKrz4R/LLyxYCUhKLwR5/BT+1eAvDr3Vgwd 6uOFpBgchX5BkR3LuJoz3IsCNtbz024c/JXq10WhcR9nzFRS+VMy6y6IvQxLQVTrq8gK N9zk+jhsWFkfDKH0grPO0+D5lFS/lnrxP8F9fo6eTi0kCb9liRqQXGqGb9WsNLp3WRiI ytwXJFMtBJpqrglg5d0n5gIAbuRVNLABcgM4W4mK5/M6je7jWkrMNoSZWl+MrA7PD75C wafQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+vsnAaACxRtsVoSxPNw4G/ut3P7SxKTkc+VdGzfYPB+JV+CxfP JC6vM0cGruOmRl5t1JzjIkKrvQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t0HAxAGODjou1yysBiPRklZspiATIK3jALlva7H/1Pk/bj3nzYOdTyPBsVKXEIeHqctSnR3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5026:b0:3a2:ea0c:ea8a with SMTP id n38-20020a05600c502600b003a2ea0cea8amr2839054wmr.53.1657621224427; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.35.4.171] ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9-20020a05600c4f0900b003a2e42ae9a4sm9545640wmq.14.2022.07.12.03.20.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <77c97281-96d9-c969-18cf-6e609098aa57@sifive.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:20:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] pwm: dwc: remove the CONFIG_OF in timer clock Content-Language: en-GB To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, Thierry Reding , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Greentime Hu , Jude Onyenegecha , Sudip Mukherjee , William Salmon , Adnan Chowdhury References: <20220712100113.569042-1-ben.dooks@sifive.com> <20220712100113.569042-7-ben.dooks@sifive.com> From: Ben Dooks In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/07/2022 11:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/07/2022 12:01, Ben Dooks wrote: >> We should probably change from the #ifdef added earlier in >> 49a0f4692a8752c7b03cb26d54282bee5c8c71bb ("wm: dwc: add timer clock") >> and just have it always in the dwc data so if we have a system with >> both PCI and OF probing it should work >> >> -- consider merging with original patch > > Missing SoB. Please run checkpatch. This was meant to be an RFC about whether it should be a single patch or merged back into the previous one.