From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
ewagner12@gmail.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
vashegde@amd.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Fix def_domain_type interaction with untrusted devices
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:18:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77fd2bba-fc59-4997-a91a-2d9235ce5cd6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240424130457.GF231144@ziepe.ca>
On 2024/4/24 21:04, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> OK, so after all that you do in fact agree? In that case, why are we still
>> mucking about proposing hacks on top of hacks in the AMD driver rather than
>> just fixing the regression sensibly?
> It is because your proposal is regressing the meaning of
> def_domain_type back to a policy knob when I've spent a bunch of work
> emptying out def_domain type implementations to get it into a
> capability report.
>
> def_domain_type is now about*capability*. Does the
> HW/SW/Driver/system support PAGING/IDENTITY or not.
>
> Meaning if def_domain_type says it is not supported then the core code
> should not use it. This is how everything was working until AMD
> changed their driver to lie about what their attach_domain would
> accept.
>
> I do not want to see def_domain_type regress back to being confused
> where some drivers are policy advice and some drivers are capability!
>
> AMD should hack their driver for the rc fix and then go and fix it
> properly to remove the PASID logic entirely from def_domain_type. I
> will also point again out that in v6.9-rc AMD doesn't even support
> PASID yet so this abuse of def_domain_type isn't even needed. 🙁
>
> The core code should contiue to treat def_domain_type as capability.
I agree with this. Ideally there should be some mechanism to disallow
any device driver to bind to the device if there's a conflict between
the core policy and iommu hw capability because iommu-dma functionality
is already compromised.
If we all agree with the statement that "the core should treat
def_domain_type as capability", the intel iommu driver needs some
enhancement as well.
For example, the intel iommu driver allows users to opt-in graphic in
passthrough mode, in that case def_domain_type will return
IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY no matter the device is trusted or not.
if ((iommu_identity_mapping & IDENTMAP_GFX) && IS_GFX_DEVICE(pdev))
return IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY;
this potentially creates same conflict as the amd driver.
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-16 13:00 Robin Murphy
2024-04-16 14:33 ` Greg KH
2024-04-16 15:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17 5:23 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-04-17 16:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-18 11:44 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-04-18 12:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-23 11:26 ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-24 13:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-24 14:05 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-24 14:18 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2024-04-24 14:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-25 1:41 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77fd2bba-fc59-4997-a91a-2d9235ce5cd6@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ewagner12@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=vashegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®