mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hongzhi, Song" <hongzhi.song@windriver.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <josef@toxicpanda.com>, <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Bug Report: Btrfs can't allocate space for delete when block size arounds 512M
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:44:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <780c3a4f-23da-45d1-6ada-26b7a380e0c2@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3eca92d0-5a57-3fff-63e1-edd3217341d5@windriver.com>

I remake the test case to be more simply.

And the send the new email.

Thanks,

--Hongzhi


On 9/4/19 10:36 AM, Hongzhi, Song wrote:
> Anybody notice this?
>
> --Hongzhi
>
>
> On 7/17/19 4:34 PM, Hongzhi, Song wrote:
>> Hi friends,
>>
>> *Description:*
>>
>>
>>     One LTP testcase, fs_fill.c, fails on btrfs with kernel error 
>> when unlink files on Btrfs device:
>>
>>     "BTRFS warning (device loop0): could not allocate space for a 
>> delete; will truncate on mount".
>>
>>
>>     I found the loop block device formatted with btrfs roughly rangs 
>> from 460M to 560M will cause the error.
>>
>>     256M and 1G all pass.
>>
>>
>>     The fs_fill.c source code:
>>
>> [https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/fs/fs_fill/fs_fill.c] 
>>
>>
>>     The fs_fill.c calls unlink which triggers the error.
>>
>> [https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/e3457e42c1b93f54bb81da746eba314fd34ad40e/testcases/kernel/fs/fs_fill/fs_fill.c#L55] 
>>
>>
>> [https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/e3457e42c1b93f54bb81da746eba314fd34ad40e/lib/safe_macros.c#L358] 
>>
>>
>>
>> *Error info:*
>>
>>     The issue maybe not reproduced everytime but four fifths chance.
>>
>>     fs_fill.c:53: INFO: Unlinking mntpoint/thread5/file0
>>     safe_macros.c:360: BROK: fs_fill.c:55: 
>> unlink(mntpoint/thread10/file0) failed: ENOSPC
>>     safe_macros.c:360: BROK: fs_fill.c:55: 
>> unlink(mntpoint/thread11/file0) failed: ENOSPC
>>     [62477.378848] BTRFS warning (device loop0): could not allocate 
>> space for a delete; will truncate on mount
>>     [62477.378905] BTRFS warning (device loop0): could not allocate 
>> space for a delete; will truncate on mount
>>
>>
>>
>> *Kernel:*
>>
>>     After v5.2-rc1, qemux86-64
>>
>>     # make -j40 ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86-64-gcc
>>     use qemu to bootup kernel
>>
>>
>> *LTP:*
>>
>>     master branch: I tested on 20190625
>>     Reproduce:
>>
>>     // build Ltp
>>     # cd Ltp-source
>>     # ./build.sh
>>
>>     // copy files to qemu
>>     # cp runltp testcases/kernel/fs/fs_fill/fs_fill to qemu
>>
>>     // login to qemu:
>>     // adjust block device size to 512M
>>     # vi runltp
>>     in function: create_block()
>>         dd if=/dev/zero of=${TMP}/test.img bs=1024 count=262144
>>         --->
>>         dd if=/dev/zero of=${TMP}/test.img bs=1024 count=524288
>>
>>     // execute testcase
>>     # runltp -f fs -s fs_fill
>>
>>
>> *Analysis:*
>>
>>     One new kernel commit contained in v5.2-rc1 introduces the issue.
>>
>>     commit c8eaeac7b734347c3afba7008b7af62f37b9c140
>>     Author: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
>>     Date:   Wed Apr 10 15:56:10 2019 -0400
>>
>>         btrfs: reserve delalloc metadata differently
>>         ...
>>
>>
>> Anyone's reply will be appreciated.
>>
>> --Hongzhi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04  3:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <b501bcff-8be0-4303-8789-363fda4658e5@windriver.com>
2019-08-02  3:11 ` Bug Report: Btrfs prompts "can't allocate space for delete" " Hongzhi, Song
2019-09-04  2:36 ` Bug Report: Btrfs can't allocate space for delete " Hongzhi, Song
2019-09-04  3:44   ` Hongzhi, Song [this message]
2019-09-04  8:03   ` Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=780c3a4f-23da-45d1-6ada-26b7a380e0c2@windriver.com \
    --to=hongzhi.song@windriver.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®