From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50753A8733 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 07:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774857537; cv=none; b=pb56Zks3GDLPwgHuD4+jQ+U6voPGMY30cqqckOfb54RBvIlUcphA1WGMAndbL9NB3HrmYdHq3AN2jBQcYKQ7vkKaDsrTUNd3qLLy0JwWy1gQWG4PfoPEG7x3EA59ijfAyzYD5B8c9yZ3z0tMYskS+9Ezr0SeKis4NWG/UbVPbvk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774857537; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SnqWez0EW1SB1lVxWQ8nuKg8Q1eyyx9SvKbnQhvJvto=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=PBUQ0LeAOES+0Ib0P6e7K6HfbCzqtpiNnLUN1AZvzzRaN/jKhHpRDUvhZE5QuQiW/24Z5uCaoFHb/hMJ25UCX5D2YetBGMyedjtnrVpjRbOc6qrNGyJbYGK2z21hOjIFJkW5zFmgO7mS/s24zWrE4uzBS/j0+AQ+2p55YC+JF4M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=eB9yRU9P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="eB9yRU9P" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774857537; x=1806393537; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SnqWez0EW1SB1lVxWQ8nuKg8Q1eyyx9SvKbnQhvJvto=; b=eB9yRU9PhK29mJvFiG8d3Lzbn2WAhvsn2rlSnVevdwtd1pZOQ7moRHnQ ObyPOb7daVnNtaNuhriSKri3zQjoaeHnVARRgkkveK5VocPES0557KuXV UmfwCGry88GHl0rAKrrrSsJjatn8KsKLEnW/g0QHyEprhdhxqF5V/CrOr oKPGHpm+tI5elZe3F6RB31zHFBFK+V6sRVceq8lU6Zy0lBSVaM5vkASac GHzWpIDpnAz8ZXxrQ+3FTgpEsfCTXkOMkJspsFbSHH8jwNhJobmtU6Q1A shYFl/518y2SaYpZIM+F0JqOMcS955/Xw6LdnX8nieXMnCi1N4573bMd1 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ntuhQXNpRxOv5Dt4uTqwLg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zapDW5ZfS+OOmU81UvNqTQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11743"; a="79445231" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,149,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="79445231" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2026 00:58:57 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hcQmstJsQsiuF/J35Y5QXw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bmeGm2TJT7mteTByAzXTlg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,149,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="225155127" Received: from allen-sbox.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.30]) ([10.239.159.30]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2026 00:58:54 -0700 Message-ID: <783629f4-4793-48b3-adf8-f2cfac87053e@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:57:31 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] iommupt/vtd: Support dirty tracking on PASID To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" , "Liu, Yi L" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux.dev" Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "Tian, Kevin" References: <20260205023405.41583-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> <20260206004325.GB943673@ziepe.ca> <9df42fd2-8a27-42be-b827-59d7308dc910@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Baolu Lu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/30/26 10:04, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote: > Hi Baolu, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Liu, Yi L >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] iommupt/vtd: Support dirty tracking on PASID >> >> Hi Baolu, >> >> On 3/23/26 10:54, Baolu Lu wrote: >>> On 3/23/26 09:51, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Kindly ping, any comments? >>> This series looks fine to me. I will queue it (with the typo in the >>> subject fixed) for iommu/next if no further concerns. Thanks! >> The series also looks good to me with one more nit besides the typo in >> the subjects. >> >> I think it's better to name device_set_dirty_tracking() to be >> domain_set_dirty_tracking() in patch 01. > May I ask your preference so I could have it in next respin, device_set_dirty_tracking vs domain_set_dirty_tracking? I prefer domain_set_dirty_tracking() according to what the helper does. Thanks, baolu