From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085C0C4321D for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 04:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60D4214C3 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 04:22:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B60D4214C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727982AbeHVHpb (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2018 03:45:31 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0120.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.120]:37329 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726676AbeHVHpb (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2018 03:45:31 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED391E2542; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 04:22:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: feast34_6c37d67e3d606 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2109 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.153.53]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 04:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <78396ba82562326f4b3a395a63e3e8dc38d608b2.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler-gcc: get back Clang build From: Joe Perches To: Dominique Martinet , Nick Desaulniers Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds , Jonathan Corbet , Arnd Bergmann , dwmw@amazon.co.uk, LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , Geert Uytterhoeven , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:22:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180822041646.GA21716@nautica> References: <1534834088-15835-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20180821123832.GA19034@nautica> <20180822041646.GA21716@nautica> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 06:16 +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote: > I think that could work, but at the point making a separate > compiler-common.h and not including compiler-gcc.h for clang sounds > better to me... More importantly here, either solution sound complex > enough to require more than a few days and proper testing for all archs > etc when compared to the partial revert we have here. The immediate need for a partial revert seems unnecessary as clang hasn't really worked for a couple releases now. The separate compiler file changes are much more sensible, even if it takes a few days.