From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755706Ab2JEMud (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 08:50:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26769 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753674Ab2JEMuc (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 08:50:32 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <17383.1349380286@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Arch Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:50:21 +0100 Message-ID: <7854.1349441421@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I assume these c6x and asm-generic changes are the ones you just asked Linus > to pull? Yes. > Doesn't it make more sense to ask us (the individual arch maintainers) to > pull our parts after Linus has pulled the generic part? I suppose so. > Do you want this ("our parts") to go in 3.7 or 3.8? 3.7 would be nice, but I know not everyone is willing to pull in this merge window. It might also make sense to wait for (a) Linus to pull those and (b) Arnd to pass the asm-generic changes along too. The main reason I'd like to get things moved along asap is that the preparatory patches get things into a known state upon which these commits can be pulled. However, the state is going to degrade over time as people make changes which requires more preparatory patches:-/ David