From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753519AbbGVXjJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:39:09 -0400 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:64659 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753044AbbGVXir (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:38:47 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM list , Viresh Kumar Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: Better separation of device addition/removal and online/offline paths Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:00:23 +0200 Message-ID: <7868353.pEStq1MJ2a@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.1.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, As per the recent discussion (http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=143758336123670&w=4), separete CPU device addition/removal code paths from the CPU online/offline code paths in the cpufreq core a bit better. Both on top of http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=143760250929586&w=4. Thanks, Rafael