mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@gmail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:01:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <787b0d920609140901l46ce6cd3l400c33e74a67b8db@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609141540.44984.ak@suse.de>

On 9/14/06, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > I guess that should be deleted then?
>
> Yes. I will delete it right now. Thanks for the notice.

Er, OK. This means I can't patch it without conflict.
Mind just adding the six lines of code needed for
support of regparm(3) apps?

> > Currently you remap signals. Whatever you do this for
> > regparm(0) should also be done for regparm(3).
>
> Not sure I parse you here. You're asking how to fix the regparm(3)
> case?

No. I'd thought that the two cases should match.
The regparm(3) case should remap signals if and only if
the regparm(0) case remaps signals. Perhaps this
is not correct if the remapping is not needed for
native Linux apps; I doubt iBCS stuff would ever be
needing regparm(3) support.

Since you plan to delete the remapping cruft from
the regparm(0) case, then obviously it should not
be added to the regparm(3) case.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-14 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-14  8:34 Albert Cahalan
2006-09-14 10:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-14 15:01   ` Albert Cahalan
2006-09-14 13:40     ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-14 16:01       ` Albert Cahalan [this message]
2006-09-14 16:23         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=787b0d920609140901l46ce6cd3l400c33e74a67b8db@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=acahalan@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®