From: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@gmail.com>
To: "David Wragg" <david@wragg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcrl@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: export context switch counts in /proc/*/stat
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:36:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <787b0d920612200936w186a783aj81d10384c54dfc7e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878xh2aelz.fsf@wragg.org>
On 12/20/06, David Wragg <david@wragg.org> wrote:
> "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:50:08PM +0000, David Wragg wrote:
> >> This patch (against 2.6.19/2.6.19.1) adds the four context
> >> switch values (voluntary context switches, involuntary
> >> context switches, and the same values accumulated from
> >> terminated child processes) to the end of /proc/*/stat,
> >> similarly to min_flt, maj_flt and the time used values.
> >
> > Hmmm, OK, do people have a use for these values?
>
> My reason for writing the patch was to track which processes are
> active (i.e. got scheduled to run) by polling these context switch
> values. The time used values are not a reliable way to detect process
> activity on fast machines. So for example, when sorting by %CPU, top
> often shows many processes using 0% CPU, despite the fact that these
> processes are running occasionally. If top sorted by (%CPU, context
> switch count delta), it might give a more useful display of which
> processes are active on the system.
Oh, that'd be great.
The cumulative ones are still not justified though, and I fear they
may be 64-bit even on i386. It turns out that an i386 procps spends
much of its time doing 64-bit division to parse the damn ASCII crap.
I suppose I could just skip those fields, but generating them isn't
too cheap and probably I'd get stuck parsing them for some other
reason -- having them separate is probably a good idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 5:40 Albert Cahalan
2006-12-20 13:20 ` David Wragg
2006-12-20 13:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-20 14:38 ` David Wragg
2006-12-20 14:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-20 15:13 ` David Wragg
2006-12-20 17:36 ` Albert Cahalan [this message]
2006-12-24 1:40 ` David Wragg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-21 6:02 Al Boldi
2006-12-18 23:50 David Wragg
2006-12-19 6:39 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-12-19 11:47 ` David Wragg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=787b0d920612200936w186a783aj81d10384c54dfc7e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=acahalan@gmail.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=david@wragg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®