From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tonyb@cybernetics.com,
jannh@google.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsg: remove read/write support
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:04:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7882dce2-4dca-3af6-7aea-7acd9997f3e9@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180712080959.21180-1-hch@lst.de>
On 7/12/18 2:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The code poses a security risk due to user memory access in ->release
> and had an API that can't be used reliably. As far as we know it was
> never used for real, but if that turns out wrong we'll have to revert
> this commit and come up with a band aid.
>
> Jann Horn did look software archives for users of this interface,
> and the only users found were example code in sg3_utils, and optional
> support in an optional module of the tgt user space iscsi target,
> which looks like a proof of concept extension of the /dev/sg
> read/write support.
>
> Tony Battersby chimes in that the code is basically unsafe to use in
> general:
>
> The read/write interface on /dev/bsg is impossible to use safely
> because the list of completed commands is per-device (bd->done_list)
> rather than per-fd like it is with /dev/sg. So if program A and
> program B are both using the write/read interface on the same bsg
> device, then their command responses will get mixed up, and program
> A will read() some command results from program B and vice versa.
> So no, I don't use read/write on /dev/bsg. From a security standpoint,
> it should definitely be fixed or removed.
Applied for 4.19.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-12 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 8:09 Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-12 14:04 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7882dce2-4dca-3af6-7aea-7acd9997f3e9@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome