mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
	Dan Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: "Qiu Wenbo" <qiuwenbo@gnome.org>,
	"Daniel Scally" <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	"Qiu Wenbo" <qiuwenbo@kylinsec.com.cn>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: int3472: Fix double free of GPIO device during unregister
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:38:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7898408e-1b33-4f22-84d2-12bcd6254402@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQCUu5vCPlglC0Kd@smile.fi.intel.com>

Hi,

On 28-Oct-25 11:02 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 08:55:07AM +0000, Dan Scally wrote:
>> On 24/10/2025 06:05, Qiu Wenbo wrote:
>>>
>>> regulator_unregister() already frees the associated GPIO device. On
>>> ThinkPad X9 (Lunar Lake), this causes a double free issue that leads to
>>> random failures when other drivers (typically Intel THC) attempt to
>>> allocate interrupts. The root cause is that the reference count of the
>>> pinctrl_intel_platform module unexpectedly drops to zero when this
>>> driver defers its probe.
>>>
>>> This behavior can also be reproduced by unloading the module directly.
>>>
>>> Fix the issue by removing the redundant release of the GPIO device
>>> during regulator unregistration.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1e5d088a52c2 ("platform/x86: int3472: Stop using devm_gpiod_get()")
> 
>> However the Fixes tag I wonder about; devm_gpiod_get() will also result in a
>> call to gpiod_put() when the module is unloaded; doesn't that mean that the
>> same issue  will occur before that commit?
> 
> Actually a good question! To me sounds like it's a bug(?) in regulator code.
> It must not release resources it didn't acquire. This sounds like a clear
> layering violation.

I think the problem is that when it comes from devicetree it is acquired
by the regulator core. Only when passed as platform-data as we do here does
this layering violation occur.

I do believe that a transfer of ownership ad done here is ok for
the platform-data special case.

Regards,

Hans


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-28 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-24  5:05 Qiu Wenbo
2025-10-24  6:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-24  7:25 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-10-28  6:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Qiu Wenbo
2025-10-28  9:34   ` Hans de Goede
2025-10-28 16:37   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-28  8:55 ` [PATCH] " Dan Scally
2025-10-28 10:02   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-28 10:38     ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2025-10-28 10:54       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-28 11:09         ` Dan Scally
2025-10-28 11:38           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-28 14:36             ` Hans de Goede
2025-10-28 14:47               ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7898408e-1b33-4f22-84d2-12bcd6254402@kernel.org \
    --to=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.scally@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiuwenbo@gnome.org \
    --cc=qiuwenbo@kylinsec.com.cn \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®