From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF280C04AB5 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3A12817C for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=synopsys.com header.i=@synopsys.com header.b="g5AtdTJS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727945AbfFCLyz (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 07:54:55 -0400 Received: from dc8-smtprelay2.synopsys.com ([198.182.47.102]:53880 "EHLO smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726179AbfFCLyy (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 07:54:54 -0400 Received: from mailhost.synopsys.com (dc8-mailhost1.synopsys.com [10.13.135.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F15C0F0B; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:55:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1559562904; bh=r4F0ihdo90nt+TZrX0NaFOaU7SRXp0rSHZgAJyLypIg=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=g5AtdTJSN9Ura/m/klQbwSDCS6KTURAL+Ol7PwSZKKCcfmKkEiABjanli89IehNiO IjLIxlp2ffmVLIXMMeUFePOchbuJtCZ3p13O/RssbN5vMsBk+ey7iEBYPm95czffYJ tZ/8zU0amp7UykIQpGNPsK8GUNTzR1A1PKbGxqhSUdPND2vdxtKrz1E9Ek/muG/Q52 u5R6p1U/JMpFE1tsmsVzZNvvK5hgFeK0FKku0K0Ine+8viVmxJatR6zJdFk06dgCtU fDdYyI44Ug7UFzAVi6aqgVrgd0E/pEJsQZ2ebHJEfHdPKintsEWLdChTA/6NgAjg0T LLQEC0XeMDODQ== Received: from US01WXQAHTC1.internal.synopsys.com (us01wxqahtc1.internal.synopsys.com [10.12.238.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C56A005D; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DE02WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com (10.225.19.94) by US01WXQAHTC1.internal.synopsys.com (10.12.238.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 04:54:49 -0700 Received: from DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com ([fe80::95ce:118a:8321:a099]) by DE02WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:54:47 +0200 From: Jose Abreu To: Voon Weifeng , "David S. Miller" , Maxime Coquelin CC: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Giuseppe Cavallaro" , Andrew Lunn , "Florian Fainelli" , Alexandre Torgue , biao huang , Ong Boon Leong , Kweh Hock Leong Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] net: stmmac: enable EHL SGMI Thread-Topic: [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] net: stmmac: enable EHL SGMI Thread-Index: AQHVF6gSDQlnqXi+Gkq6toMYkgpK1aaJ1UvQ Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:54:46 +0000 Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B93B791@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> References: <1559332694-6354-1-git-send-email-weifeng.voon@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1559332694-6354-1-git-send-email-weifeng.voon@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.107.19.176] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Voon Weifeng > This patch-set is to enable Ethernet controller > (DW Ethernet QoS and DW Ethernet PCS) with SGMII interface in Elkhart Lak= e. > The DW Ethernet PCS is the Physical Coding Sublayer that is between Ether= net > MAC and PHY and uses MDIO Clause-45 as Communication. This series look fine to me but unfortunately I don't have my GMAC5.10=20 setup available to test for regressions ... The changes look isolated=20 though. Could you please run the stmmac selftests at least and add the output=20 here ? Thanks, Jose Miguel Abreu