From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0889C4320E for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C743610A7 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233125AbhHZJEO (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 05:04:14 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:47146 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240829AbhHZJEM (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 05:04:12 -0400 Received: from imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570551FE68; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:03:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1629968604; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FGs8P9c7NG5tXLKcRLwkhDpYXDkytUmmOPmA4s52z3A=; b=nH9l2Ag+NSNyhE+Y+6E/C0KpurfUbX9vNHKkb7ApNCgGI1lQpktmT07ui6o/5ffD+YDobO KnCYNRMSHCWhnIVIYMprqNNuwgwnR7SdVw3P/wyuYdVWT8cuuyekYAODH53fF60/eGbmKF sYoHi4vnWwepw4wQ3HiuMRXSbl9CKMc= Received: from imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0612213AA5; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 932eOttYJ2GBFQAAGKfGzw (envelope-from ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:03:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/string: Bring optimized memcmp from glibc To: Linus Torvalds , Nikolay Borisov Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nick Desaulniers , linux-fsdevel , Dave Chinner References: <20210721135926.602840-1-nborisov@suse.com> From: Nikolay Borisov Message-ID: <78aab96b-aa95-2f7b-89aa-f6f4b2071c69@suse.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:03:23 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.07.21 г. 19:40, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So would you mind reminding me about this patch the next merge window? > Unless there was some big extrernal reason why the performance of > memcmp() mattered to you so much (ie some user that actually noticed > and complained) and we really want to prioritize this.. I'm reminding you of spinning this patch up for 5.15 :)