From: shrikanth suresh hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
parth@linux.ibm.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com,
patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, David.Laight@aculab.com,
pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, tj@kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, joshdon@google.com, timj@gnu.org,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com,
youssefesmat@chromium.org, joel@joelfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Add latency priority for CFS class
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 14:04:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78d06985-c31a-cdbf-08ef-5b4772a81a03@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221028093403.6673-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> This patchset restarts the work about adding a latency priority to describe
> the latency tolerance of cfs tasks.
Hi Vincent.
Tested the patches on the power10 machine. It is 80 core system with SMT=8. i.e
total of 640 cpus. on the large workload which mainly interacts with the
database there is minor improvement of 3-5%.
the method followed is creating a cgroup, assigning a latency nice value of -20,
-10, 0 and adding the tasks to procs of the cgroup. outside of cgroup, stress-ng
load is running and it is not set any latency value. stress-ng --cpu=768 -l 50
with microbenchmarks, hackbench the values are more or less the same. for large
process pool of 60, there is 10% improvement. schbench tail latencies show
significant improvement with low and medium load upto 256 groups. only 512
groups shows a slight decline.
Hackbench (Iterations or N=50)
Process 6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
10 0.13 0.14
20 0.18 0.18
30 0.24 0.25
40 0.34 0.33
50 0.40 0.41
60 0.53 0.49
schbench (Iterations or N=5)
Groups: 1
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 10.8 9.8
75.0th: 12.4 11.4
90.0th: 14.2 13.2
95.0th: 15.6 14.6
99.0th: 27.8 19.0
99.5th: 38.0 21.6
99.9th: 66.2 25.4
Groups: 2
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 11.2 10.8
75.0th: 13.2 12.4
90.0th: 15.0 15.0
95.0th: 16.6 16.6
99.0th: 22.4 22.8
99.5th: 23.8 27.8
99.9th: 30.2 45.6
Groups: 4
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 13.8 11.2
75.0th: 16.0 13.2
90.0th: 18.6 15.2
95.0th: 20.4 16.6
99.0th: 28.8 21.6
99.5th: 48.8 25.2
99.9th: 900.2 47.0
Groups: 8
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 17.8 14.4
75.0th: 21.8 17.2
90.0th: 25.4 20.4
95.0th: 28.0 22.4
99.0th: 52.8 28.4
99.5th: 156.4 32.6
99.9th: 1990.2 52.0
Groups: 16
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 26.0 21.0
75.0th: 33.0 27.8
90.0th: 39.6 34.4
95.0th: 43.4 38.6
99.0th: 66.8 48.8
99.5th: 170.6 60.6
99.9th: 3308.8 201.6
Groups: 32
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 40.8 38.6
75.0th: 55.4 52.8
90.0th: 67.0 64.2
95.0th: 74.2 71.6
99.0th: 106.0 90.0
99.5th: 323.8 133.0
99.9th: 4789.6 459.2
Groups: 64
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 72.6 68.2
75.0th: 103.4 97.8
90.0th: 127.6 120.0
95.0th: 141.2 132.0
99.0th: 343.4 158.4
99.5th: 1609.0 180.8
99.9th: 6571.2 686.6
Groups: 128
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 147.2 147.2
75.0th: 216.4 217.2
90.0th: 268.4 268.2
95.0th: 300.6 294.8
99.0th: 3500.0 638.6
99.5th: 5995.2 2522.8
99.9th: 10390.4 9451.2
Groups: 256
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 340.8 333.2
75.0th: 551.8 530.2
90.0th: 3528.4 1919.2
95.0th: 7312.8 5558.4
99.0th: 14630.4 12912.0
99.5th: 17955.2 14950.4
99.9th: 23059.2 20230.4
Groups: 512
6.1_Base 6.1_Latency_Nice
50.0th: 1021.8 990.6
75.0th: 9545.6 10044.8
90.0th: 20972.8 21638.4
95.0th: 29971.2 30291.2
99.0th: 42355.2 46707.2
99.5th: 48550.4 52057.6
99.9th: 58867.2 60147.2
Tested-by: shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-13 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-28 9:33 Vincent Guittot
2022-10-28 9:33 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] sched/fair: fix unfairness at wakeup Vincent Guittot
2022-11-05 14:32 ` Chen Yu
2022-11-07 8:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-10-28 9:33 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] sched: Introduce latency-nice as a per-task attribute Vincent Guittot
2022-10-28 9:33 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] sched/core: Propagate parent task's latency requirements to the child task Vincent Guittot
2022-10-28 9:33 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] sched: Allow sched_{get,set}attr to change latency_nice of the task Vincent Guittot
2022-10-28 9:33 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] sched/fair: Take into account latency priority at wakeup Vincent Guittot
2022-11-13 8:02 ` shrikanth suresh hegde
2022-11-13 8:39 ` shrikanth suresh hegde
2022-11-14 10:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-10-28 9:34 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] sched/fair: Add sched group latency support Vincent Guittot
2022-11-01 19:28 ` Qais Yousef
2022-11-03 8:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-03 14:27 ` Qais Yousef
2022-11-03 17:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-04 10:14 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-04 10:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-04 10:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-04 10:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-04 10:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-04 12:06 ` Qais Yousef
2022-11-04 11:47 ` Qais Yousef
2022-11-04 11:21 ` Qais Yousef
2022-11-04 13:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-05 14:28 ` Qais Yousef
2022-11-04 14:24 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-04 14:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-04 15:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-04 15:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-04 15:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-05 13:41 ` Qais Yousef
2022-10-28 9:34 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] sched/core: Support latency priority with sched core Vincent Guittot
2022-10-28 9:34 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] sched/fair: Add latency list Vincent Guittot
2022-10-28 9:34 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] sched/fair: remove check_preempt_from_others Vincent Guittot
2022-11-13 7:56 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] Add latency priority for CFS class shrikanth suresh hegde
2022-11-13 8:34 ` shrikanth suresh hegde [this message]
2022-11-14 10:40 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78d06985-c31a-cdbf-08ef-5b4772a81a03@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=timj@gnu.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=youssefesmat@chromium.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®