From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Mark kfuncs as __noclone
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:03:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78d0a599-4917-4551-b4c1-2c3cab743b8c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <622cc7980bad96bb2c7ac8d23619da1374c794a4.camel@gmail.com>
On 8/26/25 11:52 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-08-27 at 07:41 +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:02:31PM -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2025-08-26 at 13:17 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> I tried with gcc14 and can reproduced the issue described in the above.
>>>> I build the kernel like below with gcc14
>>>> make KCFLAGS='-O3' -j
>>>> and get the following build error
>>>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_strnchr
>>>> make[2]: *** [/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux:91: vmlinux] Error 255
>>>> make[2]: *** Deleting file 'vmlinux'
>>>> Checking the symbol table:
>>>> 22276: ffffffff81b15260 249 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 1 bpf_strnchr.cons[...]
>>>> 235128: ffffffff81b1f540 296 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 bpf_strnchr
>>>> and the disasm code:
>>>> bpf_strnchr:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> bpf_strchr:
>>>> ...
>>>> bpf_strnchr.constprop.0
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> So in symbol table, we have both bpf_strnchr.constprop.0 and bpf_strnchr.
>>>> For such case, pahole will skip func bpf_strnchr hence the above resolve_btfids
>>>> failure.
>>>>
>>>> The solution in this patch can indeed resolve this issue.
>>> It looks like instead of adding __noclone there is an option to
>>> improve pahole's filtering of ambiguous functions.
>>> Abstractly, there is nothing wrong with having a clone of a global
>>> function that has undergone additional optimizations. As long as the
>>> original symbol exists, everything should be fine.
>>>
>>> Since kfuncs are global, this should guarantee that the compiler does not
>>> change their signature, correct? Does this also hold for LTO builds?
>>> If so, when pahole sees a set of symbols like [foo, foo.1, foo.2, ...],
>>> with 'foo' being global and the rest local, then there is no real need
>>> to filter out 'foo'.
>>>
>>> Wdyt?
>> I think we should do both: fix resolve_btfids to ignore compiler
>> optimization suffixes (.isra., .constprop., .part., .cold, ...) and add
>> __noclone.
>>
>> This feels like the safest path IMHO. Fixing resolve_btfids alone works
>> with current compilers, but future compiler versions, under aggressive
>> IPA/LTO optimizations, might decide that the main global symbol is
>> redundant and drop it altogether, leading to similar issues.
>>
>> Basically, fixing the tool makes the BTF pipeline more robust, adding
>> __noclone also makes the exported symbols themselves more robust,
>> regardless of compiler optimizations.
> If we are being really paranoid about LTO builds, is __noclone sufficient?
> E.g. [1] does not imply that signature can't be changed.
> We currently apply only __retain__, here is a little test with both attributes:
>
> $ cat foo.c
> __attribute__((__noclone__, __retain__))
> int foo(int a) {
> return a;
> }
>
> $ cat main.c
> int foo(int);
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> return foo(0);
> }
>
> $ gcc -O3 -Wall -flto foo.c main.c -o a.out
Currently kernel does not support LTO for gcc build.
> $ nm a.out | grep foo
> $ objdump -Sdr a.out | grep foo
> $ objdump -Sdr a.out | less
> $ nm a.out | grep foo | wc -l
> 0
> $ objdump -Sdr a.out | grep foo | wc -l
> 0
>
> export.h:EXPORT_SYMBOL does the following trick:
>
> extern typeof(cachemode2protval) cachemode2protval;
> static void * __attribute__((__used__))
> __attribute__((__section__(".discard.addressable")))
> __UNIQUE_ID___addressable_cachemode2protval489 = (void *)(uintptr_t)&cachemode2protval;
> asm(".section \".export_symbol\",\"a\" ;\
> __export_symbol_cachemode2protval: ;\
> .asciz \"\" ;\
> .ascii \"\" \"\\0\" ;\
> .balign 8 ;\
> .quad cachemode2protval ;\
> .previous");
>
> Should we employ something similar?
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-noclone-function-attribute
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-27 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-22 14:05 Andrea Righi
2025-08-26 20:17 ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-27 5:02 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-27 5:41 ` Andrea Righi
2025-08-27 6:52 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-27 7:01 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-27 7:45 ` Andrea Righi
2025-08-27 17:03 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2025-08-27 17:00 ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-27 19:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-27 19:28 ` Alan Maguire
2025-08-27 19:41 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-27 19:52 ` Alan Maguire
2025-08-27 22:28 ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-27 22:10 ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-27 2:10 ` David Vernet
2025-09-24 6:32 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-24 7:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78d0a599-4917-4551-b4c1-2c3cab743b8c@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®