From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mschmidt@redhat.com,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnxt_en: Allow to set switchdev mode without existing VFs
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78dbf8d2-c13d-a921-bd73-a1361753cb66@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230409090224.GE14869@unreal>
On 09. 04. 23 11:02, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 03:04:55PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>> Remove an inability of bnxt_en driver to set eswitch to switchdev
>> mode without existing VFs by:
>>
>> 1. Allow to set switchdev mode in bnxt_dl_eswitch_mode_set() so
>> representors are created only when num_vfs > 0 otherwise just
>> set bp->eswitch_mode
>> 2. Do not automatically change bp->eswitch_mode during
>> bnxt_vf_reps_create() and bnxt_vf_reps_destroy() calls so
>> the eswitch mode is managed only by an user by devlink.
>> Just set temporarily bp->eswitch_mode to legacy to avoid
>> re-opening of representors during destroy.
>> 3. Create representors in bnxt_sriov_enable() if current eswitch
>> mode is switchdev one
>>
>> Tested by this sequence:
>> 1. Set PF interface up
>> 2. Set PF's eswitch mode to switchdev
>> 3. Created N VFs
>> 4. Checked that N representors were created
>> 5. Set eswitch mode to legacy
>> 6. Checked that representors were deleted
>> 7. Set eswitch mode back to switchdev
>> 8. Checked that representros were re-created
>
> Why do you think that this last item is the right behavior?
> IMHO all configurations which were done after you switched mode
> should be cleared and not recreated while toggling.
No, I mean that if I switch back to switchdev mode then representors
should be created again for existing virtual functions not that
representors should be restored with their existing state...
So the point 8 should say:
"8. Checked that representors exist again for VFs"
Ivan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-11 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 13:04 Ivan Vecera
2023-04-09 9:02 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-11 5:40 ` Ivan Vecera [this message]
2023-04-11 10:22 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-04-11 12:02 ` Ivan Vecera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78dbf8d2-c13d-a921-bd73-a1361753cb66@redhat.com \
--to=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®