mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mschmidt@redhat.com,
	Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnxt_en: Allow to set switchdev mode without existing VFs
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:40:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78dbf8d2-c13d-a921-bd73-a1361753cb66@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230409090224.GE14869@unreal>

On 09. 04. 23 11:02, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 03:04:55PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>> Remove an inability of bnxt_en driver to set eswitch to switchdev
>> mode without existing VFs by:
>>
>> 1. Allow to set switchdev mode in bnxt_dl_eswitch_mode_set() so
>>     representors are created only when num_vfs > 0 otherwise just
>>     set bp->eswitch_mode
>> 2. Do not automatically change bp->eswitch_mode during
>>     bnxt_vf_reps_create() and bnxt_vf_reps_destroy() calls so
>>     the eswitch mode is managed only by an user by devlink.
>>     Just set temporarily bp->eswitch_mode to legacy to avoid
>>     re-opening of representors during destroy.
>> 3. Create representors in bnxt_sriov_enable() if current eswitch
>>     mode is switchdev one
>>
>> Tested by this sequence:
>> 1. Set PF interface up
>> 2. Set PF's eswitch mode to switchdev
>> 3. Created N VFs
>> 4. Checked that N representors were created
>> 5. Set eswitch mode to legacy
>> 6. Checked that representors were deleted
>> 7. Set eswitch mode back to switchdev
>> 8. Checked that representros were re-created
> 
> Why do you think that this last item is the right behavior?
> IMHO all configurations which were done after you switched mode
> should be cleared and not recreated while toggling.

No, I mean that if I switch back to switchdev mode then representors
should be created again for existing virtual functions not that
representors should be restored with their existing state...
So the point 8 should say:
"8. Checked that representors exist again for VFs"

Ivan


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-11  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-06 13:04 Ivan Vecera
2023-04-09  9:02 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-04-11  5:40   ` Ivan Vecera [this message]
2023-04-11 10:22 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-04-11 12:02   ` Ivan Vecera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78dbf8d2-c13d-a921-bd73-a1361753cb66@redhat.com \
    --to=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®