From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] rcu: Prevent expedite reporting within RCU read-side section
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:53:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78ee5416-5485-662e-c0a2-0091e30f65e9@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180309084154.GA24031@X58A-UD3R>
On 3/9/2018 5:41 PM, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:01:56AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 07:08:25PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> 2. Clear its bit of ->expmask *only* when it's out of RCU read
>>> sections and keep others unchanged. So it will be cleared at the
>>> end of the RCU read section in that case.
>>>
>>> This option would also work because we anyway check both
>>> ->exp_tasks and ->expmask to finish the expedite-gp.
>>
>> This could be made to work, but one shortcoming is that the grace
>> period would end up waiting on later read-side critical sections
>> that it does not really need to wait on. Also, eventually all the
>
> I don't think it waits on any later ones since ->expmask would be
> cleared at the end of the previous RCU read section.
Now having simplified my patch, with the simplified version, I can
see what you were saying. Right, the expedite-gp might be extended
as you said. That optimization cannot be achieved this way without
reggression.
You're awesome. Thank you for explaning the reason why not.
--
Thanks,
Byungchul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 5:31 Byungchul Park
[not found] ` <CANrsvRO-QUS0p_2KMgNJN5h64mN49J37uh7KSYm7Fo5csi_t1w@mail.gmail.com>
2018-03-06 12:43 ` Byungchul Park
2018-03-06 17:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-06 13:42 ` Boqun Feng
2018-03-06 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-07 5:55 ` Byungchul Park
2018-03-07 6:25 ` Byungchul Park
2018-03-07 15:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-08 10:08 ` Byungchul Park
2018-03-08 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-09 8:41 ` Byungchul Park
2018-03-09 8:53 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78ee5416-5485-662e-c0a2-0091e30f65e9@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®