From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: kernel@oss.qualcomm.com, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight-tmc: Add configurable timeout for flush and tmcready
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:23:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78f2179d-26c2-47f0-bc19-b72e5e51ad29@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250627-flush_timeout-v1-1-2f46a8e9f842@quicinc.com>
On 27/06/2025 12:10 pm, Yuanfang Zhang wrote:
> The current implementation uses a fixed timeout via
> coresight_timeout(), which may be insufficient when multiple
> sources are enabled or under heavy load, leading to TMC
> readiness or flush completion timeout.
>
> This patch introduces a configurable timeout mechanism for
> flush and tmcready.
>
What kind of values are you using? Is there a reason to not increase the
global one?
I don't think it's important what value we choose because it's only to
stop hangs and make it terminate eventually. As far as I can see it
wouldn't matter if we set it to a huge value like 1 second. That would
only cause a big delay when something has actually gone wrong. Under
normal circumstances the timeout won't be hit so it doesn't really need
to be configurable.
> Signed-off-by: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> index 88afb16bb6bec395ba535155228d176250f38625..286d56ce88fe80fbfa022946dc798f0f4e72f961 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -35,13 +36,31 @@ DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(etb_devs, "tmc_etb");
> DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(etf_devs, "tmc_etf");
> DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(etr_devs, "tmc_etr");
>
> +static u32 tmc_timeout;
> +
> +static void tmc_extend_timeout(struct csdev_access *csa, u32 offset, int pos, int val)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = tmc_timeout; i > 0; i--) {
> + if (i - 1)
I didn't get what the if is for here? Removing it does basically the
same thing, but if you do want to keep it maybe if (i > 1) is more
explanatory.
> + udelay(1);
Can you not do udelay(tmc_timeout)?
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int tmc_wait_status(struct csdev_access *csa, u32 offset, int pos, int val)
> +{
> + return coresight_timeout_action(csa, offset, pos, val,
> + tmc_extend_timeout);
> +}
> +
> int tmc_wait_for_tmcready(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
> {
> struct coresight_device *csdev = drvdata->csdev;
> struct csdev_access *csa = &csdev->access;
>
> /* Ensure formatter, unformatter and hardware fifo are empty */
> - if (coresight_timeout(csa, TMC_STS, TMC_STS_TMCREADY_BIT, 1)) {
> + if (tmc_wait_status(csa, TMC_STS, TMC_STS_TMCREADY_BIT, 1)) {
> dev_err(&csdev->dev,
> "timeout while waiting for TMC to be Ready\n");
> return -EBUSY;
> @@ -61,7 +80,7 @@ void tmc_flush_and_stop(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
> ffcr |= BIT(TMC_FFCR_FLUSHMAN_BIT);
> writel_relaxed(ffcr, drvdata->base + TMC_FFCR);
> /* Ensure flush completes */
> - if (coresight_timeout(csa, TMC_FFCR, TMC_FFCR_FLUSHMAN_BIT, 0)) {
> + if (tmc_wait_status(csa, TMC_FFCR, TMC_FFCR_FLUSHMAN_BIT, 0)) {
> dev_err(&csdev->dev,
> "timeout while waiting for completion of Manual Flush\n");
> }
> @@ -561,11 +580,31 @@ static ssize_t stop_on_flush_store(struct device *dev,
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(stop_on_flush);
>
> +static ssize_t timeout_cfg_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", tmc_timeout);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t timeout_cfg_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
> +
> + if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + tmc_timeout = val;
> +
> + return size;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(timeout_cfg);
>
Seeing as the existing timeout is global for all devices, if we do want
a configurable one shouldn't we make the global one configurable rather
than per-device? That seems too fine grained to me.
> static struct attribute *coresight_tmc_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_trigger_cntr.attr,
> &dev_attr_buffer_size.attr,
> &dev_attr_stop_on_flush.attr,
> + &dev_attr_timeout_cfg.attr,
> NULL,
> };
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 408c97c4a5e0b634dcd15bf8b8808b382e888164
> change-id: 20250627-flush_timeout-a598b4c0ce7b
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 11:10 Yuanfang Zhang
2025-06-27 11:23 ` James Clark [this message]
2025-06-27 14:17 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-30 10:40 ` Yuanfang Zhang
2025-06-30 11:08 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-03 8:23 ` Yuanfang Zhang
2025-06-30 10:03 ` Yuanfang Zhang
2025-06-30 13:46 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78f2179d-26c2-47f0-bc19-b72e5e51ad29@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=kernel@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®