Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/149] 5.10.156-rc1 review

["Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022, at 11:25, YueHaibing wrote:
> On 2022/11/25 18:02, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022, at 09:05, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 12:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:17:36PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel bisected this reported problem and found the first bad commit,
>>>>>
>>>>> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>>>>>     net: broadcom: Fix BCMGENET Kconfig
>>>>
>>>> But that is in 5.10.155, 5.15.79, 6.0.9, and 6.1-rc5.  It is not new to
>>>> this -rc release.
>>>
>>> It started from 5.10.155 and this is only seen on 5.10 and other
>>> branches 5.15, 6.0 and mainline are looking good.
>> 
>> I think the original patch is wrong and should be fixed upstream.
>> The backported patch in question is a one-line Kconfig change doing
>
> It seems lts 5.10 do not contain commit e5f31552674e ("ethernet: fix 
> PTP_1588_CLOCK dependencies"),
> there is not PTP_1588_CLOCK_OPTIONAL option.

Ok, so there is a second problem then.

Greg, please just revert fbb4e8e6dc7b ("net: broadcom: Fix BCMGENET Kconfig")
in stable/linux-5.10.y: it depends on e5f31552674e ("ethernet: fix
PTP_1588_CLOCK dependencies"), which we probably don't want backported
from 5.15 to 5.10.

YueHaibing, do you agree with my suggestion for improving the
upstream 8d820bc9d12b ("net: broadcom: Fix BCMGENET Kconfig")
commit? Can you send a follow-up fix, or should I?

      Arnd