From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: "Ilpo JÀrvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@codefidence.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Ori Finkelman <ori@comsleep.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc5-mmotm1101 - kernel BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3707!
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:01:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7916.1257300093@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:34:19 +0200." <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911032330090.3488@melkinkari.cs.Helsinki.FI>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3428 bytes --]
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:34:19 +0200, Ilpo JÃâ¬rvinen said:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>
> > Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > > Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Seen right after I started 'fetchmail'. Reproducible - 3 out of 3.
> > > > I'll bisect this tonight if nobody jumps up and yells they know what it
> > > > is...
> > > >
> > Bah... this is most probably my fault. Sorry about that.
> >
> > Can you please try the patch in the next email?
Tried while at home, machine panic'ed. No netconsole here at the moment, sorry.
> > But also, can you please send me the route table in effect when this happened
> > and the fetchmail command line/config (removing any passwords or account
> > details of course)? I want to understand better when this happens.
% route -n -A inet
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
128.173.12.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 128.173.12.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
% route -n -A inet6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
::1/128 :: U 0 687 1 lo
2001:468:c80:2103:215:c5ff:fec8:334e/128 :: U 0 53533 1 lo
2001:468:c80:2103::/64 :: UA 256 316 0 eth0
fe80::215:c5ff:fec8:334e/128 :: U 0 176 1 lo
fe80::218:deff:fe9c:24e0/128 :: U 0 0 1 lo
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth0
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 wlan0
ff02::1/128 ff02::1 UC 0 451 0 eth0
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth0
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 wlan0
::/0 fe80::20f:35ff:fe3e:d41a UGDA 1024 2082 1 eth0
Command line was just 'fetchmail'. Relevant .fetchmailrc:
set postmaster "valdis"
set bouncemail
set no spambounce
set properties ""
set daemon 240
poll imap.vt.edu with proto IMAP and options
user 'valdis' there with password 'redacted' is 'valdis' here ssl fetchsizelimit 0 smtpaddress turing-police.cc.vt.edu
(imap.vt.edu is 198.82.183.77 - so off the local subnet)
> According to the stacktrace, it came from ipv6 side which doesn't have any
> null checking what so ever atm (you only handled ipv4 correctly). ...You
> should be a bit more careful next time when adding any BUG_ONs...
Why was this blowing chunks in the IPv6 when I was making an IPv4 connection
then? I just noticed that. My fetchmail can't make an IPv6 TCP connection to
our IMAP server because the server isn't v6-enabled yet. And although I
contact our DNS over IPv6, but that's UDP not TCP.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-04 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 17:50 Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-11-03 18:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-03 19:20 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-11-03 21:34 ` Ilpo JÀrvinen
2009-11-04 2:01 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2009-11-04 2:34 ` David Miller
2009-11-04 6:38 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-11-04 16:40 ` [PATCH testing] Do not call IPv4 specific func in tcp_check_req Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-11-05 7:22 ` David Miller
2009-11-04 16:43 ` 2.6.32-rc5-mmotm1101 - kernel BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3707! Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-11-05 2:33 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-11-05 7:25 ` David Miller
2009-11-05 7:22 ` David Miller
2009-11-04 6:27 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-11-03 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/1] Use defaults when no route options are available Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-11-04 13:28 ` David Miller
2009-11-04 14:27 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7916.1257300093@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gilad@codefidence.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ori@comsleep.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®