From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Ian Ray <ian.ray@gehealthcare.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Kamal Dasu" <kamal.dasu@broadcom.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Don't program invalid host driver type for fixed eMMC type
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:00:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <791c00cf-4f25-423c-b2f3-4cdc2d2c4a2b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPx+jO-59V8bg+DB4pOqEmdPZrfLi098YsyzkBRnf2Krb7ufVA@mail.gmail.com>
On 29/09/2026 16:06, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Adrian
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2026 at 2:29 PM Ian Ray <ian.ray@gehealthcare.com> wrote:
>>
>> The host controller driver type value used by the MMC core [1] _mostly_
>> overlaps with the eMMC device I/O driver strength value [2] as shown in
>> the table below; however, there is _no_ host mapping for eMMC value 4.
>
> I think the mapping exists only because that is what the SD spec
> provided when this was introduced.
>
> We can certainly add something that corresponds to value 4 from the
> eMMC spec as well, to make this complete.
>
>>
>> host value/type | eMMC value | nominal impedance | strength
>> ------------------+------------+-------------------+---------
>> 0 / Type B | 0 | 50 Ohm | x1
>> 1 / Type A | 1 | 33 Ohm | x1.5
>> 2 / Type C | 2 | 66 Ohm | x0.75
>> 3 / Type D | 3 | 100 Ohm | x0.5
>> (none) | 4 | 40 Ohm | x1.2
>>
>> [1] MMC_SET_DRIVER_TYPE_* in include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>
>> [2] 'fixed-emmc-driver-type', see JESD84-B51 Table 206 and
>>
>>
>> Since commit 5a52c5701a67 ("mmc: core: Fix host controller programming
>> for fixed driver type"), the selected eMMC driver strength is passed
>> directly to mmc_set_driver_type(). For a fixed eMMC driver type of 4
>> this reaches sdhci_set_ios(), which only knows types 0..3 and therefore
>> complains on every ios update:
>>
>> mmc2: invalid driver type, default to driver type B
>
> Perhaps the print above from sdhci_set_ios() is simply a bit
> misleading. For example, it looks like arasan_select_phy_clock()
> actually uses the value in ios.drv_type as is.
>
> To me, it looks like the problem is that mmc_select_drive_strength()
> doesn't really do its job correctly, as it should help us to figure
> out what is supported by the card *and* by the host, so we can request
> a proper driver type when calling the ->set_ios() callback.
mmc_select_drive_strength() returns the card value directly and
the host value in *drv_type.
fixed-emmc-driver-type as described by
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml
doesn't mention the host controller, and the original commits
6186d06c519e2 "mmc: parse new binding for eMMC fixed driver type"
be17f1ce8572d "mmc: core: properly init drv_type" seemingly
deliberately left it alone.
5a52c5701a67d "mmc: core: Fix host controller programming for
fixed driver type" introduces a new policy: fixed-emmc-driver-type
is a host controller setting also.
If that was done by mmc_select_drive_strength(), it would look
something like below ( note it no longer allows fixed_drv_type to override
->select_drive_strength() , and fixed-emmc-driver-type will then hit
any nonremovable SD or SDIO ):
int mmc_select_drive_strength(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int max_dtr,
int card_drv_type, int *drv_type)
{
struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
int fixed_drv_type = host->fixed_drv_type;
int host_drv_type = SD_DRIVER_TYPE_B;
*drv_type = 0;
if (!host->ops->select_drive_strength) {
if (fixed_drv_type >= 0 &&
(card_drv_type & mmc_driver_type_mask(fixed_drv_type))) {
*drv_type = fixed_drv_type;
return fixed_drv_type;
}
return 0;
}
/* Use SD definition of driver strength for hosts */
if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A)
host_drv_type |= SD_DRIVER_TYPE_A;
if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_C)
host_drv_type |= SD_DRIVER_TYPE_C;
if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D)
host_drv_type |= SD_DRIVER_TYPE_D;
/*
* The drive strength that the hardware can support
* depends on the board design. Pass the appropriate
* information and let the hardware specific code
* return what is possible given the options
*/
return host->ops->select_drive_strength(card, max_dtr,
host_drv_type,
card_drv_type,
drv_type);
}
and:
static void mmc_select_driver_type(struct mmc_card *card)
{
int card_drv_type, drive_strength, drv_type = 0;
card_drv_type = card->ext_csd.raw_driver_strength |
mmc_driver_type_mask(0);
drive_strength = mmc_select_drive_strength(card,
card->ext_csd.hs200_max_dtr,
card_drv_type, &drv_type);
card->drive_strength = drive_strength;
if (drv_type)
mmc_set_driver_type(card->host, drv_type);
}
But that doesn't help with drivers where the controller does
do not support the value passed by fixed-emmc-driver-type even
though the card does. mmc_select_drive_strength() has no way
of knowing that. The ->select_drive_strength() callback
allows selecting different values. fixed-emmc-driver-type is
one value.
The warning in sdhci.c seems correct. SDHCI is an SD standard,
so doesn't define value 4 (and only has 2 bits for the field).
The selected driver strength is not being programmed - deserves
a warning.
Perhaps if the affected driver implements
->select_drive_strength():
static int ???_select_drive_strength(struct mmc_card *card,
unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
int card_drv, int *host_driver_strength)
{
struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
int fixed_drv_type = host->fixed_drv_type;
if (fixed_drv_type >= 0 &&
(card_drv & mmc_driver_type_mask(fixed_drv_type))) {
if (fixed_drv_type == 4)
*drv_type = MMC_SET_DRIVER_TYPE_B;
else
*drv_type = fixed_drv_type;
return fixed_drv_type;
}
return 0;
}
But that requires the changes to
mmc_select_drive_strength() and mmc_select_driver_type()
above (with its caveats), so that ->select_drive_strength()
overrides fixed-emmc-driver-type. That would be fine for
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c, and probably
amd_select_drive_strength(), but it is starting to get
complicated.
A simpler alternative is for the affected driver to hook
->set_ios() and fix up the value.
void ???_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
{
if (ios->drv_type == 4)
ios->drv_type = MMC_SET_DRIVER_TYPE_B;
return sdhci_set_ios(mmc, ios);
}
And in probe (assuming struct sdhci_host *host):
host->mmc_host_ops.set_ios = ???_set_ios;
>
>>
>> The mmc card itself is still programmed correctly (the HS_TIMING driver
>> strength field is set from card->drive_strength independently), so this
>> is a spurious, repeated warning for a valid, documented configuration.
>>
>> Change to only program the host when the eMMC driver type value maps to
>> a valid host driver type.
>>
>> Tested on i.MX8MP (usdhc3, eMMC in HS400) with
>> `fixed-emmc-driver-type = <4>`: the warning is no longer logged and the
>> HS_TIMING register contains 0x43 as expected.
>>
>> Fixes: 5a52c5701a67 ("mmc: core: Fix host controller programming for fixed driver type")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Ray <ian.ray@gehealthcare.com>
>
> I have looped in Adrian, to get his opinion on this.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> index 05444ecf3909..ff5d4b805998 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> @@ -1371,9 +1371,11 @@ static void mmc_select_driver_type(struct mmc_card *card)
>>
>> card->drive_strength = drive_strength;
>>
>> - if (fixed_drv_type >= 0 && drive_strength)
>> - mmc_set_driver_type(card->host, drive_strength);
>> - else if (drv_type)
>> + if (fixed_drv_type >= 0 && drive_strength) {
>> + /* eMMC driver types >= 4 have no host controller equivalent. */
>> + if (drive_strength <= MMC_SET_DRIVER_TYPE_D)
>> + mmc_set_driver_type(card->host, drive_strength);
>> + } else if (drv_type)
>> mmc_set_driver_type(card->host, drv_type);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.49.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-26 12:29 Ian Ray
2026-09-29 13:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-09-30 19:00 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2026-10-01 15:39 ` Ian Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=791c00cf-4f25-423c-b2f3-4cdc2d2c4a2b@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ian.ray@gehealthcare.com \
--cc=kamal.dasu@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®