From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 0/7] Improve GbEth performance on Renesas RZ/G2L and related SoCs
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:38:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7923894a-c42c-b4ae-1828-775d1fb68a10@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bf96e67-d35b-813c-ac9b-f2094903ac55@omp.ru>
On 2/12/24 11:53 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
[...]
>>>> This series aims to improve peformance of the GbEth IP in the Renesas
>>>
>>> You didn't fix the typo in "peformance"... :-/
>>>
>>>> RZ/G2L SoC family and the RZ/G3S SoC, which use the ravb driver. Along
>>>> the way, we do some refactoring and ensure that napi_complete_done() is
>>>> used in accordance with the NAPI documentation for both GbEth and R-Car
>>>> code paths.
>>>>
>>>> Performance improvment mainly comes from enabling SW IRQ Coalescing for
>>>
>>> And in "improvment" too... :-/
>>
>> I'll fix this and the above type in v3.
>
> TIA! Chances are this will end up in the merge commit...
>
>>>> all SoCs using the GbEth IP, and NAPI Threaded mode for single core SoCs
>>>> using the GbEth IP. These can be enabled/disabled at runtime via sysfs,
>>>> but our goal is to set sensible defaults which get good performance on
>>>> the affected SoCs.
>>>>
>>>> The performance impact of this series on iperf3 testing is as follows:
>>>> * RZ/G2L Ethernet throughput is unchanged, but CPU usage drops:
>>>> * Bidirectional and TCP RX: 6.5% less CPU usage
>>>> * UDP RX: 10% less CPU usage
>>>>
>>>> * RZ/G2UL and RZ/G3S Ethernet throughput is increased for all test
>>>> cases except UDP TX, which suffers a slight loss:
>>>> * TCP TX: 32% more throughput
>>>> * TCP RX: 11% more throughput
>>>> * UDP TX: 10% less throughput
>>>> * UDP RX: 10183% more throughput - the previous throughput of
>>>
>>> So this is a real figure? I thought you forgot to erase 10... :-)
>>
>> Yes, throughput went from 1.06Mbps to 109Mbps for the RZ/G2UL with these
>> changes.
>
> Hm, that gives me even 10283%! :-)
Stupid me, forgot to subtract 100%... :-)
[...]
MBR, Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 9:19 Paul Barker
2024-02-06 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net: ravb: Simplify poll & receive functions Paul Barker
2024-02-10 16:13 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-06 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: ravb: Count packets instead of descriptors in RX path Paul Barker
2024-02-10 16:32 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-06 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v2 3/7] net: ravb: Always process TX descriptor ring Paul Barker
2024-02-10 16:39 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-06 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v2 4/7] net: ravb: Always update error counters Paul Barker
2024-02-10 16:46 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-06 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v2 5/7] net: ravb: Align poll function with NAPI docs Paul Barker
2024-02-10 17:10 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-06 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v2 6/7] net: ravb: Enable SW IRQ Coalescing for GbEth Paul Barker
2024-02-10 18:42 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-12 11:45 ` Paul Barker
2024-02-12 20:40 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-14 9:29 ` Paul Barker
2024-02-06 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v2 7/7] net: ravb: Use NAPI threaded mode on 1-core CPUs with GbEth IP Paul Barker
2024-02-10 19:00 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-10 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v2 0/7] Improve GbEth performance on Renesas RZ/G2L and related SoCs Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-12 11:52 ` Paul Barker
2024-02-12 20:53 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-13 9:38 ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2024-02-14 9:17 ` Paul Barker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7923894a-c42c-b4ae-1828-775d1fb68a10@omp.ru \
--to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®