From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add Realm RTT mapping and invalidation helpers
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 18:48:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <799454ae-9950-4b5a-8a06-9966ede152b6@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102141304.126883-9-steven.price@arm.com>
Hi Steven
On 02/11/2026 14:12, Steven Price wrote:
> Add the RMI RTT creation and unmap helpers needed by CCA Realm stage-2
> memory operations. REC exit handling and guest requested RIPAS changes
> follow in the vCPU series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h | 14 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c | 346 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> index 58d825e40bdf..72a9449f00d7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,20 @@ int kvm_init_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
> int kvm_realm_teardown_stage2(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> +enum kvm_gfn_range_filter;
> +
> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range_filter(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned long ipa,
> + unsigned long size,
> + bool may_block,
> + enum kvm_gfn_range_filter attr_filter);
> +
> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned long ipa,
> + unsigned long size,
> + bool unmap_private,
> + bool may_block);
This can be removed now in favor of the one above ?
> +
> static inline bool kvm_realm_is_private_address(struct realm *realm,
> unsigned long addr)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> index f190143b33ba..1066f767f85d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,83 @@ static int get_start_level(struct realm *realm)
> return 4 - stage2_pgtable_levels(realm->ia_bits);
> }
>
> +static int find_map_level(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long end)
> +{
> + int level = KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL;
> +
> + while (level > get_start_level(realm)) {
> + unsigned long map_size = rmi_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1);
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, map_size) ||
> + (start + map_size) > end)
> + break;
> +
> + level--;
> + }
> +
> + return level;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long rmi_range_entry_size(int rmi_size)
I am wondering if we should move rmi_addr_block_size_to_bytes() from
drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c to include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h and
allow the consumers to deal with the address range entries.
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON(rmi_size > KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return kvm_granule_size(KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL - rmi_size);
> +}
> +
> +static int undelegate_range_desc(unsigned long desc)
> +{
> + unsigned long size = rmi_range_entry_size(RMI_ADDR_RANGE_BLOCK_SIZE(desc));
> + unsigned long count = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_COUNT(desc);
> + unsigned long addr = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_ADDR(desc);
> + unsigned long state = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_STATE(desc);
> +
> + if (state == RMI_OP_MEM_UNDELEGATED)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (size * count == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return rmi_undelegate_range(addr, size * count);
> +}
> +
> +static phys_addr_t alloc_delegated_granule(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t phys;
> + void *virt;
> +
> + if (mc) {
> + virt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(mc);
> + } else {
> + virt = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO |
> + __GFP_ACCOUNT);
> + }
> +
> + if (!virt)
> + return PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> +
> + phys = virt_to_phys(virt);
> + if (rmi_delegate_page(phys)) {
> + free_page((unsigned long)virt);
> + return PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> + }
> +
> + return phys;
> +}
> +
> +static phys_addr_t alloc_rtt(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t phys = alloc_delegated_granule(mc);
> +
> + if (phys != PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
> + kvm_account_pgtable_pages(phys_to_virt(phys), 1);
> +
> + return phys;
> +}
> +
> static void free_rtt(phys_addr_t phys)
> {
> if (rmi_free_delegated_page(phys))
> @@ -42,6 +119,32 @@ static void free_rtt(phys_addr_t phys)
> kvm_account_pgtable_pages(phys_to_virt(phys), -1);
> }
>
> +static long realm_rtt_create(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long addr,
> + int level,
> + phys_addr_t phys)
> +{
> + addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, rmi_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1));
As pointed out in the other patch, this could now be replaced with
kvm_granule_size().
> + return rmi_rtt_create(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), phys, addr, level);
Does it make sense to save "rd_phys" as we tend to use the physical
address more than the virt and we end up converting it all the time ?
> +}
> +
> +static long realm_rtt_fold(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long addr,
> + int level,
> + phys_addr_t *rtt_granule)
> +{
> + unsigned long out_rtt;
> + long ret;
> +
> + addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, rmi_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1));
> + ret = rmi_rtt_fold(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), addr, level, &out_rtt);
> +
> + if (rtt_granule)
> + *rtt_granule = out_rtt;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * realm_rtt_destroy - Destroy an RTT at @level for @addr.
> *
> @@ -65,6 +168,43 @@ static long realm_rtt_destroy(struct realm *realm, unsigned long addr,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int realm_create_rtt_levels(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long ipa,
> + int level,
> + int max_level,
> + struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
> +{
> + while (level++ < max_level) {
> + phys_addr_t rtt = alloc_rtt(mc);
> + long ret;
> +
> + if (rtt == PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = realm_rtt_create(realm, ipa, level, rtt);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + free_rtt(rtt);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret) == RMI_ERROR_RTT &&
> + RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret) == level - 1) {
> + /* The RTT already exists, continue */
> + free_rtt(rtt);
nit: We seem to be releasing the rtt (undelegating it and
freeing a page) only to be reallocated later (and re-delegated). We
could optimise this a little bit and may be reuse it for the next
iteration ?
(I understand this is rather a corner case)
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + WARN(1, "Failed to create RTT at level %d: %ld\n",
> + level, ret);
> + free_rtt(rtt);
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int realm_tear_down_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
> unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> @@ -161,6 +301,64 @@ static int realm_tear_down_rtt_range(struct realm *realm,
> start, end);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Returns 0 on successful fold, a negative value on error, a positive value if
> + * we were not able to fold all tables at this level.
> + */
> +static int realm_fold_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + int not_folded = 0;
> + ssize_t map_size;
> + unsigned long addr, next_addr;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(level > KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + map_size = rmi_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1);
> +
> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
> + phys_addr_t rtt_granule;
> + long ret;
> + unsigned long align_addr = ALIGN(addr, map_size);
> +
> + next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
> +
> + ret = realm_rtt_fold(realm, align_addr, level, &rtt_granule);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + switch (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret)) {
> + case RMI_SUCCESS:
> + free_rtt(rtt_granule);
> + break;
> + case RMI_ERROR_RTT:
> + if (level == KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL ||
> + RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret) < level) {
Should this be RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret) == level ?
Additionally if the walk terminated at a shallow level, i.e.,
RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret) < level), then we don't have to conclude
that the table was NOT folded. In effect, the table is actually folded
at level above.
Also, we could move the next_addr in this case skip to the addr
past to ALIGN(addr + 1, kvm_granule_size(RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret) - 1))
> + not_folded++;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* Recurse a level deeper */
> + ret = realm_fold_rtt_level(realm,
> + level + 1,
> + addr,
> + next_addr);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + } else if (ret == 0) {
> + /* Try again at this level */
> + next_addr = addr;
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return not_folded;
> +}
> +
> static int realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> @@ -196,6 +394,154 @@ int kvm_realm_teardown_stage2(struct kvm *kvm)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void realm_unmap_shared_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long end,
> + bool may_block)
> +{
> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> + unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
> + unsigned long next_addr, addr;
> + unsigned long shared_bit = BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1);
> +
> + if (start >= end)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Callers may pass either an IPA range or its shared alias. Add the
> + * shared bit only for the former. Use addition so an exclusive end at
> + * shared_bit advances to the end of the IPA space.
> + */
> + if (start < shared_bit) {
> + start += shared_bit;
> + end += shared_bit;
> + }
> +
> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
> + long ret;
> +
> + ret = rmi_rtt_unprot_unmap(rd, addr, end, RMI_ADDR_TYPE_NONE,
> + 0, &next_addr, NULL, NULL);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> + return;
> +
> + switch (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret)) {
> + case RMI_SUCCESS:
> + break;
> + case RMI_ERROR_RTT: {
> + int err_level = RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret);
> + int level = find_map_level(realm, addr, end);
> +
> + if (err_level >= level) {
> + /* Nothing present, so skip */
> + next_addr = addr + rmi_rtt_level_mapsize(err_level);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ret = realm_create_rtt_levels(realm, addr, err_level,
> + level, NULL);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
> + return;
> + /* Retry with the RTT levels in place */
> + next_addr = addr;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (may_block)
> + cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + }
> +
> + realm_fold_rtt_level(realm, get_start_level(realm) + 1,
> + start, end);
> +}
> +
> +static void realm_unmap_private_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long end,
> + bool may_block)
> +{
> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> + unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
> + unsigned long next_addr, addr;
> + long ret;
> +
> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
> + unsigned long out_range;
> + unsigned long flags = RMI_ADDR_TYPE_SINGLE;
> + /* TODO: Optimise using RMI_ADDR_TYPE_LIST */
> +
> +retry:
> + ret = rmi_rtt_data_unmap(rd, addr, end, flags, 0,
> + &next_addr, &out_range, NULL);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> + return;
> +
> + if (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret) == RMI_ERROR_RTT) {
> + phys_addr_t rtt;
> +
> + if (next_addr > addr)
> + continue; /* UNASSIGNED */
This is no longer valid. out_top (next_addr in our case) is only valid
when ret == RMI_SUCCESS. Please drop. See VTKMV.
> +
> + rtt = alloc_rtt(NULL);
> + if (WARN_ON(rtt == PHYS_ADDR_MAX))
> + return;
> + ret = realm_rtt_create(realm, addr,
> + RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret) + 1, rtt);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
> + free_rtt(rtt);
> + return;
> + }
> + goto retry;
> + } else if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + ret = undelegate_range_desc(out_range);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
> + break;
> +
> + if (may_block)
> + cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + }
> +
> + realm_fold_rtt_level(realm, get_start_level(realm) + 1,
> + start, end);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range_filter(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long size, bool may_block,
> + enum kvm_gfn_range_filter attr_filter)
> +{
> + unsigned long end = start + size;
> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> +
> + if (!kvm_realm_is_created(kvm))
> + return;
> +
> + end = min(BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1), end);
> +
> + if (attr_filter & KVM_FILTER_SHARED)
> + realm_unmap_shared_range(kvm, start, end, may_block);
> + if (attr_filter & KVM_FILTER_PRIVATE)
> + realm_unmap_private_range(kvm, start, end, may_block);
> +}
> +
---8>---
> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long size, bool unmap_private,
> + bool may_block)
> +{
> + enum kvm_gfn_range_filter attr_filter = KVM_FILTER_SHARED;
> +
> + if (unmap_private)
> + attr_filter |= KVM_FILTER_PRIVATE;
> +
> + kvm_realm_unmap_range_filter(kvm, start, size, may_block, attr_filter);
> +}
> +
---8<---
No longer needed ?
> void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 14:12 [PATCH 00/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Prepare Realm memory management Steven Price
2026-11-02 14:12 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Reserve the RMM mode Steven Price
2026-11-02 14:12 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Introduce Realms Steven Price
2026-11-03 11:34 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-02 14:12 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Check for RMI support at KVM init Steven Price
2026-11-04 10:23 ` Kohei Enju
2026-11-04 10:27 ` Kohei Enju
2026-11-04 10:39 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-04 10:47 ` Kohei Enju
2026-11-02 14:12 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Check for LPA2 support and SHA-256 Steven Price
2026-11-03 11:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-02 14:12 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: arm64: Handle attributes in stage2_unmap_range Steven Price
2026-11-02 14:12 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-11-02 23:49 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-02 14:12 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Tear down RTTs Steven Price
2026-11-03 15:20 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-02 14:12 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add Realm RTT mapping and invalidation helpers Steven Price
2026-11-04 18:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2026-11-04 18:59 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-02 14:13 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Prevent memslot modifications after Realm creation Steven Price
2026-11-02 14:13 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-11-02 14:13 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add Realm stage-2 MMU operations Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=799454ae-9950-4b5a-8a06-9966ede152b6@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®