Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

[Zamir SUN <sztsian@gmail.com>]

On 10/13/20 9:02 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:06:16 +0800
> Zamir SUN <sztsian@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:17 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> [ Removing the powertop mailing list because it's rejecting everything ]
>>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:41:20 -0700
>>> Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>> Once it's shown that it works for all the package maintainers, I will tag
>>>>> it which should create the tarballs automatically on the above link.
>>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> It builds fine for me after manually creating the tarball from git.
>>>> Once there is an official versioned tarball I'll push it into
>>>> openSUSE.
>>>>
>>>> I presume some perf Makefile changes will be forthcoming to use it,
>>>> rather than continuing to force build it out of TRACE_EVENT_DIR
>>>>   
>>>
>>> Zamir found this issue with the Documentation man pages:
>>>
>>> Note, I'm not sure the proper way to fix this. I think this is the last
>>> issue I need to resolve before making the tag.
>>>   
>>
>> If anyone interested in, the discussion of this document compiling is
>> in the thread "libtraceevent: make doc-install tries different file
>> names than generated".
>>
>> With the patch Steve mentioned, I can package this in RPM already. And
>> it's pending review in Fedora now.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887470
>>
>> So, for me, there is no more issue for Fedora packaging.
>>
> 
> So should I just add that one patch and tag it?
> 

That would be great, at least for Fedora packaging.

Thanks!

-- 
Zamir SUN
Fedora user
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E