From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933035Ab3IMNN6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:13:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com ([209.85.160.49]:45840 "EHLO mail-pb0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933021Ab3IMNNy (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:13:54 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 092/228] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:30:38 +0530 Message-Id: <799a45eb0d50557b20e508e55f98ce2df9e16b76.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c index 132c966..f7717ef 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c @@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ static int bL_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) else policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL; - policy->cur = bL_cpufreq_get(policy->cpu); - cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, topology_core_cpumask(policy->cpu)); dev_info(cpu_dev, "%s: CPU %d initialized\n", __func__, policy->cpu); -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e