From: YS Kim <historic59@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Question regarding direntry read error in fat filesystem when a device is removed
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:00:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79a3cd740903032200g5c0af4cbr12e03355c9c614b0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have a question about too many error messages from FAT when
unexpected device removal occurs.
I got the following error messages when I unplugged a USB
drive(formatted as FAT) during direntry reading.
sd 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
FAT: Directory bread(block 1478192) failed
sd 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
FAT: Directory bread(block 1478193) failed
sd 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
FAT: Directory bread(block 1478194) failed
sd 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
FAT: Directory bread(block 1478195) failed
...
>From the code of fat__get_entry in dir.c, I found that it continues to
read the next device block
even if the block reading has been failed. Because of this continuous
read, a lot of error messages
come up if the device itself is removed during reading fairly many
files, and it causes the malfunction
of my embedded system.
I think this code is to make the filesystem available to read the next
block when a storage contains
bad blocks, so that a user can backup remainings in case that some
portion of a storage are dead.
However, if the storage is a NAND flash memory, the flash driver is
supposed to perform bad block
management (because of the NAND charateristics) before the filesystem
encounters the bad block.
Thus, if I modify the code to just return error when fat__get_entry
fails to read blocks, could it be
cause any side effects? Except the purpose of backup/recovery, is
there any other reason for
the continuous block read?
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-04 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-04 6:00 YS Kim [this message]
[not found] <cbSsR-2ry-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-03-08 13:29 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=79a3cd740903032200g5c0af4cbr12e03355c9c614b0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=historic59@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®