From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2AFECAAD8 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 21:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229844AbiIVVWm (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:22:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45928 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230175AbiIVVWe (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:22:34 -0400 Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com (new3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48CFEEE98 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DD4580A45; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:22:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:22:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1663881747; x=1663885347; bh=7E8ohZ7amP 4gmMgu5k2Mte2rYzeIOBzbLxi1Q9hD2zg=; b=GMfVkGZn3p8Dxn9TucP9T3PrS3 xWyJvvFRO8ZAR/0pZedq8FzHUhAkqg0DPJmy3GXVf2SET56ofTB4HoJUECJhMeM3 gE6s2XAXb/1AKX8fhABqwNsJE4f39jKdnnbJo8wDy4DVQDgbr4HLFo2s+K3l7XBD zkvyXKoDltk4/SK8OOt3SG4HbO2KY2oc/PiJA3a5lXlbpdxRbnKhMjw7k2k0LpvV ALRkyyq7zo3Rp0mV/AZSIgoFjUOcAs60jGfP1NBusPlZE9f+d6mvdubYDlUOEPWg d0nwIayIJDoWWFlDMZuswiPLysgcw887Ms2xoh9tFpYtJn98nFCB9FSzafcg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1663881747; x=1663885347; bh=7E8ohZ7amP4gmMgu5k2Mte2rYzeI OBzbLxi1Q9hD2zg=; b=LmBHiD21tAxTykxG34ksZtjWpvHgfbnWZGim2j/5TypW SGK25hrcFGVwhrm/K8KVoLk4hDCjV/lc2jJU5ema1Msaxu5wGXaL/GvNljF9mOY7 dGygsEN6QbChnQ2iLgJOUfGJgdExYccts6Tk6dzJAmX1EZxpczF1JHhdNGDSpY8+ p+yulxajHiUIBeh7LLuivK0hOQlveT94gPL1QXd9BptpPDWDpnCTvtS6PBuffIOI MoPurj8uWdwFey+uoMgsBvA4CyK2wFWPUMEhsqmfG7RnBXT0CUhNu4ua/21eDn9o rGUefThDtbWlrJrtvuKI2kUA3xZr/VLIyvZ+YtIN0A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeefgedguddtudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdet rhhnugcuuegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeffheeugeetiefhgeethfejgfdtuefggeejleehjeeutefhfeeggefhkedt keetffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe grrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6948DB60086; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:22:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-935-ge4ccd4c47b-fm-20220914.001-ge4ccd4c4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <79fed88c-7dae-4131-a005-b8374b5fe660@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8c1c4506-bd21-a35e-d6e5-3c7897715c18@gmail.com> References: <87427dd0-7307-57b2-4008-2ffb839a099a@gmail.com> <8c1c4506-bd21-a35e-d6e5-3c7897715c18@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 23:22:07 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Florian Fainelli" , "Linus Torvalds" Cc: soc@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes for 6.0-rc6 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 8:17 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 9/22/22 11:13, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> I could pull your Broadcom fixes directly on top if you/Arnd would >> prefer that as a solution? > > Thanks for the offer, no real urgency on my side, if there is a -rc7, > maybe Arnd can submit a follow up for ARM SoC fixes, as there is a good > chance we will accumulate more of those between -rc6 and then. If not, > and Arnd is fine with it, yes please pull mine directly, thanks! Yes, that was my plan already, sorry for not making that clearer already: I still have a couple of fixes pull requests in a backlog, including yours. Since the fixes branch was already large and the rest has not been in my tree yet, I decided to send whatever I had already, but planned to pick the rest up tomorrow morning to send early next week after I get a successful test result from the build bots. Arnd