From: "Christian Kohlschütter" <christian@kohlschutter.com>
To: "Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
wens@kernel.org, "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Markus Reichl" <m.reichl@fivetechno.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
"Linux MMC List" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399-nanopi4: Fix voltage regulator config
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:04:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7AFECB02-5A87-43DD-8161-6068720AB8E3@kohlschutter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14EE0603-99C5-49AE-BDDB-C22C5B1924E2@kohlschutter.com>
Am 18.07.2022 um 14:02 schrieb Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>:
>
> A series of issues exist around the "vcc3v0_sd" voltage regulator that
> made it necessary to mark it "always-on".
>
> With the patch "regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent
> double-init", this option is no longer necessary.
> ...
Walking back on my claim in the commit message that no further patches are needed for the u-boot integration to work.
Other than that, the actual patch is unchanged.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-17 19:29 [PATCH] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-07-17 19:32 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-07-18 12:04 ` Christian Kohlschütter [this message]
2022-07-18 20:59 ` Christian Kohlschütter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7AFECB02-5A87-43DD-8161-6068720AB8E3@kohlschutter.com \
--to=christian@kohlschutter.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.reichl@fivetechno.de \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®