From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261736AbTIOXtM (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:49:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261741AbTIOXtM (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:49:12 -0400 Received: from fmr05.intel.com ([134.134.136.6]:21166 "EHLO hermes.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261736AbTIOXtJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:49:09 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Subject: RE: Status of patches: es7000 & picmode Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:49:05 -0700 Message-ID: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304AF5B@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Status of patches: es7000 & picmode Thread-Index: AcN73ajOhp0BrcBkRdq0DaqruQOXpgABTPnA From: "Nakajima, Jun" To: "Andrew de Quincey" , , "linux-acpi" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2003 23:49:06.0334 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3213BE0:01C37BE3] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Len is traveling today, and he should be available soon. We wanted to test it a bit first because of the large changes to how IRQs were set up. Looks like we haven't heard complaints about it? I thought your changes for es7000 were applicable only to 2.6. Is that correct? Thanks, Jun > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew de Quincey [mailto:adq_dvb@lidskialf.net] > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:02 PM > To: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-acpi > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Status of patches: es7000 & picmode > > Just checking up so things don't get lost... what is the status of my > es7000 > patch and my picmode patch? > > Neither of them is in the acpi test trees at http://linux-acpi.bkbits.com/.