From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de>,
John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
trix@redhat.com, toke@toke.dk, kvalo@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: initialize arrays at compile time
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 10:36:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a12fd4599758b8cd5fd376db6c9a950d2ed2094.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <233074c3-03dc-cf8b-a597-da0fb5d98be0@newmedia-net.de>
On Sun, 2022-03-20 at 18:17 +0100, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> Am 20.03.2022 um 17:48 schrieb John Crispin:
> >
> >
> > On 20.03.22 16:20, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > array[size] = { 0 };
> >
> > should this not be array[size] = { }; ?!
> >
> > If I recall correctly { 0 } will only set the first element of the
> > struct/array to 0 and leave random data in all others elements
> >
> > John
>
> You are right, john
No. The patch is fine.
Though generally the newer code in the kernel uses
type dec[size] = {};
to initialize stack arrays.
array stack declarations not using 0
$ git grep -P '^\t(?:\w++\s*){1,2}\[\s*\w+\s*\]\s*=\s*\{\s*\};' -- '*.c' | wc -l
213
array stack declarations using 0
$ git grep -P '^\t(?:\w++\s*){1,2}\[\s*\w+\s*\]\s*=\s*\{\s*0\s*\};' -- '*.c' | wc -l
776
Refer to the c standard section on initialization 6.7.8 subsections 19 and 21
19
The initialization shall occur in initializer list order, each initializer provided for a
particular subobject overriding any previously listed initializer for the same subobject
all subobjects that are not initialized explicitly shall be initialized implicitly the same as
objects that have static storage duration.
...
21
If there are fewer initializers in a brace-enclosed list than there are elements or members
of an aggregate, or fewer characters in a string literal used to initialize an array of known
size than there are elements in the array, the remainder of the aggregate shall be
initialized implicitly the same as objects that have static storage duration.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-20 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-20 15:20 trix
2022-03-20 16:16 ` Joe Perches
2022-03-20 16:48 ` John Crispin
2022-03-20 17:17 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2022-03-20 17:36 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2022-03-23 13:13 ` Tom Rix
2022-03-20 17:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2022-03-20 18:46 ` David Laight
2022-03-21 13:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a12fd4599758b8cd5fd376db6c9a950d2ed2094.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®