From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Cc: <linux@treblig.org>, <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] i40e deadcoding
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:36:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a1575b2-f790-4376-985d-2a68f81037b4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250104081636.67a10134@kernel.org>
On 1/4/2025 8:16 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 17:37:08 +0000 linux@treblig.org wrote:
>> This is a bunch of deadcoding of functions that
>> are entirely uncalled in the i40e driver.
>>
>> Build tested only.
>
> Intel folks, is it okay if we take this (and the igc series)
> in directly? Seems very unlikely to require testing...
It's fine to take directly. I don't think this needs testing either.
I believe this will get picked up from here:
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Thanks,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-06 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-02 17:37 linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] i40e: Deadcode i40e_aq_* linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] i40e: Remove unused i40e_blink_phy_link_led linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] i40e: Remove unused i40e_(read|write)_phy_register linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] i40e: Deadcode profile code linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] i40e: Remove unused i40e_get_cur_guaranteed_fd_count linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] i40e: Remove unused i40e_del_filter linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] i40e: Remove unused i40e_commit_partition_bw_setting linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] i40e: Remove unused i40e_asq_send_command_v2 linux
2025-01-02 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] i40e: Remove unused i40e_dcb_hw_get_num_tc linux
2025-01-04 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] i40e deadcoding Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-06 18:36 ` Tony Nguyen [this message]
2025-01-06 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a1575b2-f790-4376-985d-2a68f81037b4@intel.com \
--to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®