mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: "David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	"Robin van der Gracht" <robin@protonic.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] counter: interrupt-cnt: add counter_push_event()
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:17:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a22b7c7-e5ac-7574-9d65-179ab605e4ca@lechnology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yfp56WznEMh7rp2O@pengutronix.de>

On 2/2/22 6:32 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Hi William,
> 
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 01:07:44PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> ...
>> So the counter_push_event() function interacts with two spinlocks:
>> events_list_lock and events_in_lock. The events_list_lock spinlock is
>> necessary because userspace can modify the events_list list via the
>> counter_enable_events() and counter_disable_events() functions. The
>> events_in_lock spinlock is necessary because userspace can modify the
>> events kfifo via the counter_events_queue_size_write() function.
>>
>> A lockless solution for this might be possible if the driver maintains
>> its own circular buffer as you suggest. The driver's IRQ handler can
>> write to this circular buffer without calling the counter_push_event()
>> function, and then flush the buffer to the Counter character device via
>> a userspace write to a "flush_events" sysfs attribute or similar; this
>> eliminates the need for the events_in_lock spinlock. The state of the
>> events_list list can be captured in the driver's events_configure()
>> callback and stored locally in the driver for reference, thus
>> eliminating the need for the events_list_lock; interrupts can be
>> disabled before the driver's local copy of events_list is modified.
>>
>> With only one reader and one writer operating on the driver's buffer,
>> you can use the normal kfifo_in and kfifo_out calls for lockless
>> operations. Perhaps that is a way forward for this problem.
> 
> As proof of concept, I implemented the double buffered version with the
> sysfs flush_events interface. Currently it feels kind of wired, I use
> poll and wait until it timeouts to run the sysfs_flush_counter() to
> trigger new data.
> 
> Here is example:
> int main(void)
> {
> 	ret = sysfs_enable_counter();
> 	...
> 
> 	fd = open("/dev/counter0", O_RDWR);
> 	...
> 
> 	ret = ioctl(fd, COUNTER_ADD_WATCH_IOCTL, watches);
> 	...
> 
> 	ret = ioctl(fd, COUNTER_ENABLE_EVENTS_IOCTL);
> 	...
> 
> 	for (;;) {
> 		struct pollfd fds[] = {
> 			{
> 				.fd = fd,
> 				.events = POLLIN,
> 			},
> 		};
> 		ssize_t i;
> 
> 		/* wait for 10 sec */
> 		ret = poll(fds, ARRAY_SIZE(fds), DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS);
> 		if (ret == -EINTR)
> 			continue;
> 		else if (ret < 0)
> 			return -errno;
> 		else if (ret == 0) {
> 			sysfs_flush_counter(); <---- request to flush queued events from the driver
> 			continue;
> 		}
> 
> 		ret = read(fd, event_data, sizeof(event_data));
> 		...
> 
> 		for (i = 0; i < ret / (ssize_t)sizeof(event_data[0]); i++)
> 			/* process event */
> 			....
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> 	return ret;
> }
> 
> If it is still the only way to go, I'll send kernel patches.
> 
> Regards,
> Oleksij
> 

Couldn't the flush be implicit in the `read()` implementation
instead of requiring a separate sysfs attribute to trigger it?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-02 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23 13:45 Oleksij Rempel
2021-11-24  6:09 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-11-24  7:27   ` Oleksij Rempel
2021-11-25  1:58     ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-11-25  7:27       ` David Jander
2021-12-06 19:24       ` David Lechner
2021-12-07  7:16         ` David Jander
2021-12-08 13:59           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-12-08 16:10             ` David Jander
2021-12-15  8:48               ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-12-15  9:08                 ` David Jander
2021-12-25  4:07                   ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-12-27 15:16                     ` David Lechner
2021-12-29  9:26                       ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-12-29 16:45                         ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-02 12:32                     ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-02-02 15:17                       ` David Lechner [this message]
2022-02-03  7:24                         ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-02-03  7:50                           ` William Breathitt Gray
2022-02-03 10:40                             ` Oleksij Rempel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a22b7c7-e5ac-7574-9d65-179ab605e4ca@lechnology.com \
    --to=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=david@protonic.nl \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robin@protonic.nl \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®