From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751070AbdKSQJw (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2017 11:09:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:32851 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750784AbdKSQJt (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2017 11:09:49 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMa4bj+J/gTiV2AVjCMg/TaByEvAkbLLFXC1wlDk07ZWlpYTekBYeWdQL6QcwE/3/2dNn5DLAA== Subject: Re: Towards 4.14 LTS To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tom Gall Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux- stable , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org References: <5E1947BC-9D22-42EB-BA29-96EA15A9C817@linaro.org> <20171119112051.GA10015@kroah.com> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <7a73bb41-8372-57d3-2aca-6840ca231167@roeck-us.net> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 08:09:46 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171119112051.GA10015@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/19/2017 03:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:50:23PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote: >> At Linaro we’ve been putting effort into regularly running kernel tests over >> arm, arm64 and x86_64 targets. On those targets we’re running mainline, -next, >> 4.4, and 4.9 kernels and yes we are adding to this list as the hardware >> capacity grows. >> >> For test buckets we’re using just LTP, kselftest and libhugetlbfs and >> like kernels we will add to this list. > > I'm sorry, I don't understand this sentance. > My parsing of it is that they will add to the list of tests as well as to the list of supported kernel versions (and/or maybe architectures ?). Guenter >> With the 4.14 cycle being a little ‘different’ in so much as the goal to >> have it be an LTS kernel I think it’s important to take a look at some >> 4.14 test results. >> >> Grab a beverage, this is a bit of a long post. But quick summery 4.14 as >> released looks just as good as 4.13, for the test buckets I named above. > > Thanks for doing this testing and letting us know. > > greg k-h >