Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add AYN Technologies

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 21/02/2026 17:31, Aaron Kling wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 4:55 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 04:11:11PM -0600, Aaron Kling wrote:
>>> From: Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Add an entry for AYN Technologies (https://www.ayntec.com/)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> This was originally submitted as part of the original Odin 2 submission
>>> [0], but that series stalled, so submitting this separately. The prefix
>>> was renamed to ayntec as per the review comment on that patch.
>>
>> And why do we want it without the rest? Answering: we don't want unused
>> binding and nothing in the commit msg explains other options.
> 
> You have told me repeatedly to not do monolithic series that cross
> subsystems. So I am working through support for the AYN qcs8550

So why is this patch not with the rest for the same subsystem?

> devices and splitting that into a bunch of different series. Several
> of those independently reference this vendor prefix and may progress

Which one? I see only one in the patchset pointed by [0]. I really do
not understand why you are doing it completely different than every
other upstreaming which you can find on lore.

> in any order, so this needs submitted separately. I am submitting it
> early to try to get it in before the rest are ready, so I don't have
> to list this as a dependency to all of them.




Best regards,
Krzysztof