On 6/17/26 1:38 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 6/16/26 8:25 PM, Harry Yoo wrote:
>> [+Cc Kees and Jonathan]
>>
>> On 6/17/26 4:39 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> Since the @GFP parameter in kmalloc_obj() etc. is now optional, change
>>> the kernel-doc to indicate that it is optional. This avoids kernel-doc
>>> warnings:
>>>
>>> WARNING: include/linux/slab.h:1101 Excess function parameter 'GFP' description in 'kmalloc_obj'
>>> WARNING: include/linux/slab.h:1113 Excess function parameter 'GFP' description in 'kmalloc_objs'
>>> WARNING: include/linux/slab.h:1128 Excess function parameter 'GFP' description in 'kmalloc_flex'
>>>
>>> Fixes: e19e1b480ac7 ("add default_gfp() helper macro and use it in the new *alloc_obj() helpers")
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>>> ---
>>
>> I think there is no better way to specify an optional parameter, so:
>> Acked-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
>>
>> By the way, the doc should probably say that it is GFP_KERNEL when it is
>> not specified?
> 
> How about (in general):
> 
>  * @...: optional GFP flags for the allocation (GFP_KERNEL when not specified)
> 
> ?

Looks good to me!

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon