From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] nfsd: CB_SEQUENCE error handling fixes and cleanups
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:08:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7acd540a-d086-4ae6-b249-8f921e5d5240@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207-nfsd-6-14-v4-0-1aa42c407265@kernel.org>
On 2/7/25 8:45 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Bruce convinced me that the single-threadedness of the workqueue and the
> fact that the RPCs are killed synchronously was enough to ensure that
> the session can't disappear out from under a running callback. Given
> that, I'm breaking these patches out into a separate series that can
> potentially be backported.
>
> I think this rework makes sense, and I've run these against pynfs,
> fstests, and nfstest, but I'm not sure how well that stresses the
> backchannel error handling. I'd like to put this into linux-next for now
> and see if any problems arise.
I'm good with the proposed code changes. A couple of general comments:
- I plan to put these changes in nfsd-testing first to get some local
NFS testing experience under our belts before exposing them to the
broader community of testers.
- nfsd-testing is not automatically merged with linux-next or fs-next.
These changes would not appear in linux-next until I move them to
nfsd-next.
- I prefer having the first patch broken into smaller changes to give
bisection a little more leverage. Eg, the "restart:" and
"bool = false" changes are fine in a single patch, but change the
recovery actions for each status code in separate patches, maybe?
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Hold back on session refcounting changes for now and just send CB_SEQUENCE
> error handling rework.
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250129-nfsd-6-14-v3-0-506e71e39e6b@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v3:
> - rename cb_session_changed to nfsd4_cb_session_changed
> - rename restart_callback to requeue_callback, and rename need_restart:
> label to requeue:
> - don't increment seq_nr on -ESERVERFAULT
> - comment cleanups
> - drop client-side rpc patch (will send separately)
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250129-nfsd-6-14-v2-0-2700c92f3e44@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v2:
> - make nfsd4_session be RCU-freed
> - change code to keep reference to session over callback RPCs
> - rework error handling in nfsd4_cb_sequence_done()
> - move NFSv4.0 handling out of nfsd4_cb_sequence_done()
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250123-nfsd-6-14-v1-0-c1137a4fa2ae@kernel.org
>
> ---
> Jeff Layton (2):
> nfsd: overhaul CB_SEQUENCE error handling
> nfsd: lift NFSv4.0 handling out of nfsd4_cb_sequence_done()
>
> fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 50934b1a613cabba2b917879c3e722882b72f628
> change-id: 20250123-nfsd-6-14-b0797e385dc0
>
> Best regards,
--
Chuck Lever
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 13:45 Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] nfsd: overhaul CB_SEQUENCE error handling Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] nfsd: lift NFSv4.0 handling out of nfsd4_cb_sequence_done() Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] nfsd: CB_SEQUENCE error handling fixes and cleanups J. Bruce Fields
2025-02-07 15:08 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7acd540a-d086-4ae6-b249-8f921e5d5240@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®