From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Wanpeng Li" <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Wanpeng Li" <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Yunhong Jiang" <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>,
"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: nVMX: Fix incorrect preemption timer vmexit in nested guest
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 19:11:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ae48d13-5349-0b81-df2b-e14217feb8f2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160706160322.kg3jbwztkfhl7gw5@hz-desktop>
On 06/07/2016 18:03, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>>> This patch also fixed the crash of L1 Xen with L2 HVM guest. Xen does
>>> not enable preemption timer for HVM guests, and will get panic if it
>>> receives a preemption timer vmexit.
>>
>> Thanks! I'm still not sure why the bit is set in the vmcs02 though...
>
> Yes, it looks really weird.
>
> I replaced "return false" in Wanpeng's patch by
>
> pr_info("VMCS: preemption timer enabled = %d\n",
> !!(vmcs_read32(PIN_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL) & PIN_BASED_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER));
>
> and redid my test. As expected, L1 Xen crashed due to the unexpected
> preemption timer vmexit. I got a log from above statement just before crash:
>
> VMCS: preemption timer enabled = 1
>
> which is expected to be 0, because preemption timer is disabled in
> vmcs02. I also modified L1 Xen to dump VMCS at crash, and it says
> preemption timer is disabled.
>
> I noticed Jim Mattson recently sent a patch "KVM: nVMX: Fix memory
> corruption when using VMCS shadowing" to fix the inconsistency between
> vmcs12 and its shadow. Is it relevant here? I'll test his patch
> tomorrow.
No, it shouldn't have any effect.
I think it happens when the post_block hook switches back from sw_timer
to hv_timer, and L2 is running. So the right fix should be along the
lines of what I posted earlier. If you don't beat me to it, I'll take
another look tomorrow.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 11:42 Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 13:26 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-07-06 13:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 16:03 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-07-06 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-07-07 1:58 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 3:55 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 1:05 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ae48d13-5349-0b81-df2b-e14217feb8f2@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
--cc=yunhong.jiang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®