From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
leo.yan@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] perf: arm_spe: Support FEAT_SPEv1p4 filters
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:42:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b080e97-375d-4521-b167-d0c4256dc464@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10f63976-afa7-4e1c-bec1-d9f2447d9c13@arm.com>
On 12/06/2025 8:35 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 05/06/25 4:19 PM, James Clark wrote:
>> FEAT_SPEv1p4 (optional from Armv8.8) adds some new filter bits, so
>> remove them from the previous version's RES0 bits using
>> PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4_EXCL. It also makes some previously available bits
>> unavailable again, so add those back using PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4_INCL.
>
> Just wondering - why cannot all the new applicable filter bits be added
> explicitly for PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4 without using exclude and include
> intermediaries.
>
They could but there would be a lot of duplication. Each version tended
to add only a few bits to the previous version. Also for consistency,
they were already defined in this way. I didn't think there was much to
gain by redefining the whole bitset just for this one, it's probably
going to look just as messy.
>> E.g:
>>
>> E[30], bit [30]
>> When FEAT_SPEv1p4 is _not_ implemented ...
>>
>> FEAT_SPE_V1P3 has the same filters as V1P2 so explicitly add it to the
>> switch.
> A small nit - should FEAT_SPE_V1P3 addition be done in a previous patch
> as it is an already existing thing ?
>
It's related to this patch because I change the default case. Before
V1P3 hits 'default:' and returns PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P2. But now the
highest supported is PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4 for the default case so I
need to add a case for V1P3 to keep it returning PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P2
filters. There's no bug.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
>> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 7 +++++++
>> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 5 ++++-
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> index f1bb0d10c39a..880090df3efc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> @@ -358,6 +358,13 @@
>> (PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_IMP & ~(BIT_ULL(18) | BIT_ULL(17) | BIT_ULL(11)))
>> #define PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P2 \
>> (PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P1 & ~BIT_ULL(6))
>> +#define PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4_EXCL \
>> + (BIT_ULL(2) | BIT_ULL(4) | GENMASK_ULL(10, 8) | GENMASK_ULL(23, 19))
>> +#define PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4_INCL \
>> + (GENMASK_ULL(31, 26))> +#define PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4 \
>> + (PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4_INCL | \
>> + (PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P2 & ~PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4_EXCL))
>>
>> /* Buffer error reporting */
>> #define PMBSR_EL1_FAULT_FSC_SHIFT PMBSR_EL1_MSS_SHIFT
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> index 3efed8839a4e..d9f6d229dce8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> @@ -701,9 +701,12 @@ static u64 arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(u16 pmsver)
>> case ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_V1P1:
>> return PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P1;
>> case ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_V1P2:
>> + case ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_V1P3:
>> + return PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P2;
>> + case ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_V1P4:
>> /* Return the highest version we support in default */
>> default:
>> - return PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P2;
>> + return PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0_V1P4;
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-12 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 10:48 [PATCH v3 00/10] perf: arm_spe: Armv8.8 SPE features James Clark
2025-06-05 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] arm64: sysreg: Add new PMSFCR_EL1 fields and PMSDSFR_EL1 register James Clark
2025-06-12 6:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-07-14 13:32 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] perf: arm_spe: Support FEAT_SPEv1p4 filters James Clark
2025-06-12 7:35 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-12 8:42 ` James Clark [this message]
2025-07-14 13:26 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-15 11:23 ` James Clark
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] perf: arm_spe: Add support for FEAT_SPE_EFT extended filtering James Clark
2025-07-14 13:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-15 12:39 ` James Clark
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for SPE_FEAT_FDS James Clark
2025-07-14 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-15 12:48 ` James Clark
2025-07-15 12:57 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-15 13:10 ` James Clark
2025-07-15 13:28 ` James Clark
2025-07-17 11:52 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: arm64: Add trap configs for PMSDSFR_EL1 James Clark
2025-07-09 9:53 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] perf: Add perf_event_attr::config4 James Clark
2025-06-30 15:35 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-14 13:56 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] perf: arm_spe: Add support for filtering on data source James Clark
2025-07-14 14:04 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-15 13:04 ` James Clark
2025-07-17 14:29 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-17 15:16 ` James Clark
2025-07-17 15:27 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-17 16:42 ` James Clark
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] tools headers UAPI: Sync linux/perf_event.h with the kernel sources James Clark
2025-06-30 15:36 ` Ian Rogers
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] perf tools: Add support for perf_event_attr::config4 James Clark
2025-06-05 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] perf docs: arm-spe: Document new SPE filtering features James Clark
2025-06-30 15:38 ` Ian Rogers
2025-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] perf: arm_spe: Armv8.8 SPE features James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b080e97-375d-4521-b167-d0c4256dc464@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®