From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3941C433E6 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEC920767 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731548AbgIAPxN (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:53:13 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44482 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726283AbgIAPxA (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:53:00 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760461045; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.45.104] (unknown [10.57.45.104]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E26ED3F71F; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:52:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 05/11] perf mem: Support AUX trace To: Leo Yan , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Alexander Shishkin , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Namhyung Kim , "Naveen N. Rao" , Ian Rogers , Kemeng Shi , Wei Li , Adrian Hunter , Al Grant , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Poirier , Mike Leach References: <20200806030727.30267-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20200806030727.30267-6-leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: nd From: James Clark Message-ID: <7b0e61d3-3f28-0e98-9c82-b9a9573bf571@arm.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:52:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200806030727.30267-6-leo.yan@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Leo, > > +static int process_attr(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused, > + union perf_event *event, > + struct evlist **pevlist) > +{ > + int err; > + > + err = perf_event__process_attr(tool, event, pevlist); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > int cmd_mem(int argc, const char **argv) > { > struct stat st; > @@ -405,8 +430,12 @@ int cmd_mem(int argc, const char **argv) > .comm = perf_event__process_comm, > .lost = perf_event__process_lost, > .fork = perf_event__process_fork, > + .attr = process_attr, > .build_id = perf_event__process_build_id, I don't understand the __maybe_unused here. And also isn't this equivalent to this without the new function: @@ -405,8 +430,12 @@ int cmd_mem(int argc, const char **argv) .comm = perf_event__process_comm, .lost = perf_event__process_lost, .fork = perf_event__process_fork, + .attr = perf_event__process_attr, .build_id = perf_event__process_build_id, James