From: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com>
To: Dongdong Deng <libfetion@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, mingo@elte.hu,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kgdb,clocksource: Prevent kernel hang in kernel debugger
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:19:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b6bb4a51001260219q1a71537do9c3e7c7fa12a04de@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce2c83091001260201j62a770d2r2379a9293f909d87@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Dongdong Deng <libfetion@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:26:39 -0600
>>> Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > This is a regression fix against: 0f8e8ef7c204988246da5a42d576b7fa5277a8e4
>>> >
>>> > Spin locks were added to the clocksource_resume_watchdog() which cause
>>> > the kernel debugger to deadlock on an SMP system frequently.
>>> >
>>> > The kernel debugger can try for the lock, but if it fails it should
>>> > continue to touch the clocksource watchdog anyway, else it will trip
>>> > if the general kernel execution has been paused for too long.
>>> >
>>> > This introduces an possible race condition where the kernel debugger
>>> > might not process the list correctly if a clocksource is being added
>>> > or removed at the time of this call. This race is sufficiently rare vs
>>> > having the kernel debugger hang the kernel
>>> >
>>> > CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>> > CC: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>>> > CC: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
>>> > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> > CC: Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
>>>
>>> The first question I would ask is why does the kernel deadlock? Can we
>>> have a backchain of a deadlock please?
>>
>> The problem arises when the kernel is stopped inside the watchdog code
>> with watchdog_lock held. When kgdb restarts execution then it touches
>> the watchdog to avoid that TSC gets marked unstable.
>>
>>> Hmm, there are all kinds of races if the watchdog code gets interrupted
>>> by the kernel debugger. Wouldn't it be better to just disable the
>>> watchdog while the kernel debugger is active?
>>
>> No, we can keep it and in most cases it clocksource_touch_watchdog()
>> helps to keep TSC alive. A simple "if (!trylock) return;" should solve
>> the deadlock problem for kgdb without opening a can of worms.
>
> Is it possible that we reset the clocksource watchdog during in
> clocksource_watchdog() ?
>
> From the code view, The action of reset clocksource watchdog is just
> set the CLOCK_SOURCE_WATCHDOG flag.
> thus if we reset it before using, I think the logic will be right.
Is this logic right for resume case?
>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index e85c234..0590983 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(watchdog_lock);
> static cycle_t watchdog_last;
> static int watchdog_running;
>
> +static int volatile clocksource_resume_watchdog;
> +
> static int clocksource_watchdog_kthread(void *data);
> static void __clocksource_change_rating(struct clocksource *cs, int rating);
>
> @@ -253,6 +255,11 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(unsigned long data)
> if (!watchdog_running)
> goto out;
>
> + if (unlikely(clocksource_resume_watchdog)) {
> + clocksource_reset_watchdog();
> + clocksource_resume_watchdog = 0;
> + }
> +
> wdnow = watchdog->read(watchdog);
> wd_nsec = clocksource_cyc2ns((wdnow - watchdog_last) & watchdog->mask,
> watchdog->mult, watchdog->shift);
> @@ -341,11 +348,7 @@ static inline void clocksource_reset_watchdog(void)
>
> static void clocksource_resume_watchdog(void)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&watchdog_lock, flags);
> - clocksource_reset_watchdog();
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&watchdog_lock, flags);
> + clocksource_resume_watchdog = 1;
> }
>
> static void clocksource_enqueue_watchdog(struct clocksource *cs)
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> tglx
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-26 4:26 [PATCH 0/4] kgdb regression fixes for 2.6.33 Jason Wessel
2010-01-26 4:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb to use hw_breakpoint API Jason Wessel
2010-01-28 17:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-28 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb to use hw_breakpointAPI Jason Wessel
2010-01-28 19:58 ` Jason Wessel
2010-01-28 20:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-28 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb to usehw_breakpointAPI Jason Wessel
2010-01-28 21:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-28 20:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb to use hw_breakpointAPI Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-28 20:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb to usehw_breakpointAPI Jason Wessel
2010-01-28 21:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-26 4:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf,hw_breakpoint: add lockless reservation for hw_breaks Jason Wessel
2010-01-26 19:25 ` Jason Wessel
2010-01-27 17:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-27 22:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf,hw_breakpoint: add lockless reservation forhw_breaks Jason Wessel
2010-01-26 4:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] kgdb,clocksource: Prevent kernel hang in kernel debugger Jason Wessel
2010-01-26 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26 8:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-26 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-26 10:01 ` Dongdong Deng
2010-01-26 10:19 ` Xiaotian Feng [this message]
2010-01-26 10:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-26 11:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-26 8:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-26 10:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-26 14:09 ` [tip:timers/urgent] clocksource: Prevent potential kgdb dead lock tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-26 20:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26 20:46 ` Jason Wessel
2010-01-26 4:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] softlockup: add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume Jason Wessel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b6bb4a51001260219q1a71537do9c3e7c7fa12a04de@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xtfeng@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damm@igel.co.jp \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=libfetion@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®