From: "Mark Pearson" <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
To: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Peter Hutterer" <peter.hutterer@redhat.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: atkbd: Fix so copilot key generates F23 keycode
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 22:33:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b7d00d2-ebef-4d0b-840a-44d6ceda8d07@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65fbce93-5f73-4b09-af55-c5d782691773@app.fastmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024, at 3:16 PM, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024, at 2:17 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 01:40:24PM -0500, Mark Pearson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024, at 1:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 07:26:19PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> On 19-Dec-24 7:15 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> > And mapping to F23 as I said should be done through udev. I doubt they
>>> > will get all OEMs settle on the same scancode.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I'll see if we can find a way to check on other vendor platforms what scancode is used.
>>> If it is a common scancode, across multiple vendors, would the patch be acceptable?
>>
>> It is currently unmapped by default, so maybe.
>>
>> FWIW:
>>
>> dtor@dtor-ws:~/kernel/work $ grep KEY_6e /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb
>> KEYBOARD_KEY_6e=wlan
>> KEYBOARD_KEY_6e=left # left on d-pad
>> KEYBOARD_KEY_6e=search
>>
>> That 2nd entry is actually from one of Thinkpad models ;)
>>
> I got confirmation from the keyboard team that 0x6e is the scancode
> from F23, and is common for all PC vendors for Windows.
>
> They pointed me at this page as confirmation:
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/inputdev/about-keyboard-input#scan-codes
> (F23 is in the table of scan codes)
>
> Does that make this patch valid again for consideration, in your opinion?
>
Apologies for the multiple emails, but just wanted to add a note that Canonical kindly tested for me on a Dell and HP platform, and confirmed they are using the same scan code (as expected at this point). This change should benefit all vendors.
Thanks
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-23 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-19 15:18 Mark Pearson
2024-12-19 15:28 ` Hans de Goede
2024-12-19 15:48 ` Mark Pearson
2024-12-19 16:01 ` Hans de Goede
2024-12-19 18:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-12-19 18:26 ` Hans de Goede
2024-12-19 18:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-12-19 18:40 ` Mark Pearson
2024-12-19 19:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-12-22 20:16 ` Mark Pearson
2024-12-23 3:33 ` Mark Pearson [this message]
2025-01-06 7:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b7d00d2-ebef-4d0b-840a-44d6ceda8d07@app.fastmail.com \
--to=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.hutterer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®