From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936020AbYEUTBx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 15:01:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754874AbYEUTBp (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 15:01:45 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.237]:19754 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754715AbYEUTBo (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 15:01:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=imRbQ8W4k6YbzgXvhgWQeuwKYgS3RPbTCXeEcCSqq2ASe1CcYBILZ1seRYbQa6ePF8qhYNTBwRZEps8DuRpTK/fT5BuBqtWlil8vYSeABCjQbq1/iVnW7wWpr+W7kMf9krSn1zK/x0GfEhFne0i/vpRE874ug2pS93Iuskpp3WI= Message-ID: <7b9198260805211201g60dd6a15ib4e27d017b292992@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 20:01:43 +0100 From: "Tom Spink" To: "Jeff Dike" Subject: Re: UML fails to locate address space Cc: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" , LKML In-Reply-To: <20080521175829.GA10648@c2.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7b9198260805200408k1d6b70a8xc7e4c24106e5020f@mail.gmail.com> <20080520135238.GB6990@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20080520173503.GA10811@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20080521021502.GB16212@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <7b9198260805210502i316c9e38lcc9b5561045dd5d@mail.gmail.com> <7b9198260805210504h278f014s5aba720360ac02ab@mail.gmail.com> <20080521175829.GA10648@c2.user-mode-linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2008/5/21 Jeff Dike : > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:04:21PM +0100, Tom Spink wrote: >> Oh No! I forgot to get rid of those nasty includes.... Take 2.... > > This is actually supposed to return the address space top, not the > size, so I changed the name and return value accordingly. > > Other than that, this is fine. The final result is below... > > Jeff > Awesome! Thanks for your help, Jeff. -- Tom Spink