From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042D9C433DF for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 17:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3EF206DF for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 17:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=firemail.cc header.i=@firemail.cc header.b="lqOkXpJe" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727845AbgGEQ75 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:59:57 -0400 Received: from mail.cock.li ([37.120.193.124]:40164 "EHLO mail.cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726956AbgGEQ75 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:59:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=firemail.cc; s=mail; t=1593968394; bh=0Z+2driqVJi6cAeWesKAUnXKCFa2gru9OFGNz60n+DA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=lqOkXpJeNnWh8GGoUNhEgyQPAUHBaLw5YaDQXtBq0lGA6ezbOqh5RYmnJbWaivGfx Xze+kGIkHyy1KejZaZNgqlrj+lk3kCZrBQEPrNIxE0U/SuAK/gY3U3HI/7uhPetBiY 03brgZJC92r58cFQX5iJ8/6UKhm+LHxIDn+pn/b7nnqmp8Rr1txV3k4E4ZSfjbHi7s c7nAftuZL4YhvIZf1ds6q4GkB4smy2658lpNINAZPCeOoMB10nQeRbu5DmLUIbh7N7 Et4SbXu28vL0/vkWDaR7+NqL3kVxStbbqAT/LNbmHjCAafsIz45VNaRKMF2+thNMeS JtRD8ObyY3t+w== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 16:59:54 +0000 From: nipponmail@firemail.cc To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, esr@thyrsus.com, rms@gnu.org, bugs@gnu.support, rms@gnu.org, dag@gnui.org, alex@vapaa.xyz Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology -- Black and white does not refer to race. Message-ID: <7b9afa3cfaa96223719e9d17dd5eefc7@firemail.cc> X-Sender: nipponmail@firemail.cc User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org You have it all wrong. The black in blacklist refers to women, as in the yin and the yang. The white refers to men: a constructive force. (While the women are destructive in society: always pitting the whitelist (men) against each-other, because said list didn't obey the blacklist (where women belong). You also have failed on the master/slave terminology: Slave refers to cute little girls: which were traditionally the slaves to men. Of-course you white idiots don't understand this: You don't like girls: you'd rather dominate other men. In the past, before the perfidy of the western man infected the entirety of the world, men were the ba'al (master) of you cute young girls. Men married little girls, and more than one of them. Men were happy. Then the "white" man happened and corrupted even the colours themselves. (Un)Naturally you wouldn't notice any of this because none of you actually like girls: you want to dominate other men; so that's what's on your mind: Dominating Black Men. Except linus. He caved to all of this due to the influence of his daughters, and why is that? Because his daughters are the only young girls he's ever been around; thus being denied child brides; like our next President Biden, he fell under the influence of his own young female relatives. And why is that? Because you idiot white men bar him and all from marrying a harem of cute young girls. You'd give your life to stop that. ---- YHWH explicitly allows child brides. > The Torah explicitly allows men to marry female children, including in > cases of the rape (tahphas) of the girl child: Devarim chapter 22, > verse 28. Key words: Na'ar (child (hebrew masoretic text)), Padia > (child: padia+philos = paedophillia (greek septuagint)) Puella (young > girl (latin vulgate)) > Nachmanides points out that a child may be called na'ar from the moment > he is born Rebecca was a child, not an adult. Na'ar means child in ancient hebrew, not adult, and the original hebrew in these passages is na'ar, not na'arah. All you have to do is read the actual hebrew glyphs, not whatever your interlinear renders them as. You /pol/s are illiterate. discover-the-truth.com/2016/11/17/what-was-rebeccas-age-when-given-away-in-marriage-naar/