Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy:phy-brcm-us: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO to replace the open code

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 08/13/2018 04:24 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO has implemented the if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR, So
> just replace them rather than duplicating its implement.

Subject should be:

phy: phy-brcm-usb: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO to replace open coded version

Thank you

> 
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c
> index d1dab36..f59b1dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c
> @@ -372,10 +372,8 @@ static int brcm_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	clk_disable(priv->usb_30_clk);
>  
>  	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, brcm_usb_phy_xlate);
> -	if (IS_ERR(phy_provider))
> -		return PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> 


-- 
Florian