From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6FDF9CC for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714008242; cv=none; b=P8IK12CNM/NJ7LTvVWH3dznI7/FZfnkGr3oPnh2SnhIyrRlaJqwM6KU6Y6Q1/Ch/fBluUJDyp+GVlXlUULf+qLWDuxqRf04u2j+JvRb57uJYxD1D+jHmQJFNWqq3LfjxoyF31gCWXOn6sgTOay0xKMrMuDh4r1ZLxyI+PSeOhL4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714008242; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gwiGGq7OLeRP9rMmRvbPh6yrmriPk2uQO+iB3xYyuD0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=NL+jmcmmkEWBHLFbzDJL4+dlYye+BUGIJrFb7YcI95j4rXBrJ8q7gzHgokJrjGL3MpCL3LiRJ7OZCvdm1qBI+poxhxcWBrIRBAJt/OY6zOvtdGAwTkXObYpuS8q7+6O2LrZBFR8OxzE+w9vrqzbDrg21aNYrUn+Svivl204FFQQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gf8mb0Bn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gf8mb0Bn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FC4EC113CD; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:24:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714008242; bh=gwiGGq7OLeRP9rMmRvbPh6yrmriPk2uQO+iB3xYyuD0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=gf8mb0BntIbxrKEVFT+hcbIzJu0aHeHTd9zBPxbTItCaXkWD24bprdH34+f4b/qZO eo22RryNgJT6H1gArqKLq8An0Nv7n3WD1Mqfa81FfJLu268B5RNkollVNIRWrMQas3 lwNkcI1ibi4FKnYHeYOFF27FpM7CkE95563mZd6zoYc/K1Dkz0VsamcjWHhaMjFbRk I2gfaMS8kT5/673Ld/txPAWXgXKYO0KnALqM5QhkS9q7HS0T+46KcM1eo6fy5VLFgG gH0tT529EUyq6PEFHCuVGv9YGWLfsINjseMh2q8iZ0IV1fGxXMBJCQVtTzovNbInCI 7/ORLYW/l8XJA== Message-ID: <7bb95d2c-be0d-488b-9f0c-23167d84e057@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:23:58 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address To: Jaegeuk Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: stable@kernel.org References: <20240424173548.1515606-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Chao Yu In-Reply-To: <20240424173548.1515606-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/4/25 1:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is > not the corruption case. > > Cc: # v6.9+ > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 > Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks,