From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932302AbWDUS0f (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:26:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932342AbWDUS0f (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:26:35 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.207]:51958 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932302AbWDUS0e convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:26:34 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qhE2otzJp3K+aOPRI+DAt0Rkz9+k6JcG6g/Q6Fr2mppOJZO8hFljgQbiV5/ip2wwAVUUV45M+IGuS7DBlWAjXlfYHqZ9O5VoOGHlxhziKLjY1wWm5s+l+jZMxKVLgLRdR5mCK4NbH7MiPzuA9yYq21RVLmuHKSojx8g5fZpZmJQ= Message-ID: <7c3341450604211126g7e431307q251f9ea49c0ebf91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:26:31 +0100 From: "Nick Warne" Reply-To: nick@linicks.net To: "Maurice Volaski" Subject: Re: iptables is complaining with bogus unknown error 18446744073709551615 Cc: "Harald Welte" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060421111530.GE5286@rama> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I also ask the same - this 'config' problem/option has been posted on the list previously, I believe. I was about to update my gateway box to 2.6.16.9 this weekend, and I do not build modules on that - so what do I need to do to ensure this xt_tcpudp is built in? Is '> make oldconfig' enough to pull this in? Nick On 21/04/06, Maurice Volaski wrote: > Thank you for your reply. > > >Hi Maurice. > > > >Didn't you report this bug already to bugzilla.netfilter.org (and maybe > >eben to the bugme.osdl.org)? Reporting a bug in three distinct places, > >even though it has been replied to at one place is not really going to > >use developer resources efficiently, don't you think? > > Sorry, to post it multiple times. Actually, two places netfilter and > then kernel bugzilla. I made the second report after it appeared > there'd would be no feedback to the first one and another kernel > revision had been issued with the problem still evident. (The first > feedback on the netfilter report crossed in the mail with the kernel > report.) > > >However, your problem seems to be something different. I suspect that > >all rules with '-p tcp' or '-p udp' don't work, whereas others do. You > >seem to be missing the xt_tcpudp.ko module, which implements that > >feature in 2.6.17-rcX kernels. > > Yep, that's it. How could one know that there is such a module called > xt_tcpudp.ko, especially since there is no corresponding config > option? Wouldn't up-to-date and complete documentation explain how to > set up the kernel config and indicate which modules should be loaded? > > On the other hand, shouldn't this module be loading automatically? > -- > > Maurice Volaski, mvolaski@aecom.yu.edu > Computing Support, Rose F. Kennedy Center > Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >