From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753890AbeDYM1j (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:27:39 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:17360 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753142AbeDYM1e (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:27:34 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,326,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="45937637" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com, zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, ak@linux.intel.com, agustinv@codeaurora.org References: <1524594014-79243-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <1524594014-79243-4-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <20180424191721.GB4427@kernel.org> <9a2070b4-9a27-4e38-f235-2d44ae39dd1f@linux.intel.com> <20180424192928.GE4427@kernel.org> From: "Liang, Kan" Message-ID: <7c69ed57-94dd-45e1-bdd8-ac0c37bc575a@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:27:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180424192928.GE4427@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/24/2018 3:29 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:23:06PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu: >> On 4/24/2018 3:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20:13AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu: >>>> From: Kan Liang >>>> >>>> Perf stat doesn't count the uncore event aliases from the same uncore >>>> block in a group, for example: >>> >>> This one is not applying to acme/perf/urgent, all the rest I got merged >>> there, the last one with that change from using strstr() to a new bool >>> in perf_evsel for the uniquifying operation having being performed. >> >> Sure. Thank you for letting me know. > > Just pushed what I have there, > Thanks Arnaldo. How about this one? Will it be applied to acme/perf/core? Or should I resend it for wider review? Thanks, Kan