From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751540AbdANQYK (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:24:10 -0500 Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:52311 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751031AbdANQYJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:24:09 -0500 Subject: Re: Fixing tools using UAPI headers? To: Laura Abbott , ben@decadent.org.uk References: Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List From: Jonathan Cameron Message-ID: <7c8212f4-05e8-a9c6-b8c0-f516be48f9eb@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:16:32 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/01/17 00:24, Laura Abbott wrote: > Hi, > > I submitted https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147343473231192&w=2 > a while ago and it was suggested postponing any discussion until > after ksummit (https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2016-September/003829.html) > Did any discussion/hacking end up happening? There's interest in > building more of the tools in Fedora but I'm not excited about > doing this if more of the tools are prone to header problems. > > Thanks, > Laura > Hi Laura, I'm afraid I wasn't at the kernel summit, but I haven't had any feedback on this being discussed, so you are wise to bring it up again. Ben, did it come up to your knowledge? If not, I guess we fall back to good old reliable email to discuss it now. Jonathan