From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756895AbYDPW74 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:59:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752713AbYDPW7s (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:59:48 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.225]:1961 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752257AbYDPW7r (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:59:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T3hvlKPh6xArgnM5FSLyAOWNj79b1woLIEj99biPqaremwyWG+cAPYWrLFqUKbduWdpnInO7lkffMJ195u+EQMHyMKMWZqEyAvcGr76i2kY++vk0DaytlqUqwCk33qHiB/RmsUZf2dqhX9J48TGHr43LyXoBQP/kBF1yASE8HD4= Message-ID: <7c86c4470804161559y1f2e1e51y9447d5b15148d5f6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:59:45 +0200 From: "stephane eranian" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Markus Metzger" , andi-suse@firstfloor.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, roland@redhat.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, juan.villacis@intel.com In-Reply-To: <20080416144723.GI24383@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080408110158.A9336@sedona.ch.intel.com> <20080415173534.b746f8da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080416144723.GI24383@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo, On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Should we skip the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK check if capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)? > > > > It's a fairly large patch. > > btw., it's already in x86/testing (has been since last week) and hence > it's in linux-next as well. > Does this include the PEBS support?