From: stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@us.ibm.com>, Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>,
Corey J Ashford <cjashfor@us.ibm.com>,
Philip Mucci <mucci@eecs.utk.edu>,
Dan Terpstra <terpstra@eecs.utk.edu>,
perfmon2-devel <perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: perf_counters issue with PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:41:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c86c4470908110841wca07382gf7487c0ed55909f2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
It seems to me there is a problem with the group counter values
when you use PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP. The counts are bogus
for all events.
Test case is pretty simple:
- single group, 2 events
- sampling on PERF_COUNT_HW_CYCLES
- other event is PERF_COUNT_HW_CYCLES
- leader has SAMPLE_IP|SAMPLE_GROUP
- no inheritance
- single thread
- using sampling in one shot mode with PERF_COUNTER_IOC_REFRESH
- all events but leader start with disabled = 0 (i.e., enabled)
- sampling period is 240000000 (cycles)
Notification 1: ip=0x401300 39100608 PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES (12)
Notification 2: ip=0x401300 17991616 PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES (12)
Notification 3: ip=0x401300 17981248 PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES (12)
Notification 4: ip=0x401300 9409478912 PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES (12)
I would expect the value for the 2nd event to be close to 240000000.
But instead,
it is going up and down. The IP, nr and id (12) fields are correct, so
the parsing of
the buffer is correct. This is with the latest from Linus's 2.6.31-rc5.
Related to PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP, I believe there is some information missing.
You need to provide the TIMING information because in the case of SAMPLE_GROUP
you'd like to be able to scale the values of the counters you are
collecting. And you
need the timing at the moment, the sample was recorded not later.
next reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-11 15:41 stephane eranian [this message]
2009-08-11 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-11 19:40 ` stephane eranian
2009-08-11 20:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-11 21:08 ` stephane eranian
2009-08-12 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-12 9:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-12 12:22 ` stephane eranian
2009-08-13 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-13 19:15 ` stephane eranian
2009-08-13 23:13 ` Corey Ashford
2009-08-13 23:49 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-08-12 20:54 ` stephane eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7c86c4470908110841wca07382gf7487c0ed55909f2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eranian@googlemail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cjashfor@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpjohn@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mucci@eecs.utk.edu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=terpstra@eecs.utk.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®